Aim: To assess the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban vs warfarin in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes treated in routine practice.
Methods: Using US MarketScan claims data for the period November 2011 to December 2016, we identified oral anticoagulation-naïve people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes (Type 1 or Type 2) and ≥12 months of continuous insurance coverage prior to the qualifying oral anticoagulation dispensing time. Rivaroxaban users were 1:1 propensity score-matched to warfarin users. Participants were followed until an event, oral anticoagulation switch/discontinuation, insurance disenrolment or end of follow-up. Rates (events/100 person-years) of the composite of stroke or systemic embolism and major bleeding were compared using Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios and 95% CIs.
Results: We assessed 5517 rivaroxaban users (20% received the reduced dose) and 5517 warfarin users with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and diabetes (~97% with Type 2 diabetes) with a median (interquartile range) available follow-up of 1.5 (0.7, 2.7) years. Rivaroxaban was associated with nonsignificant reductions in stroke or systemic embolism (0.87 vs 1.35/100 person-years; hazard ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.44-1.05) and ischaemic stroke (0.69 vs 0.93/100 person-years; hazard ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.48-1.30) compared with warfarin. No differences in major bleeding (2.7 vs 3.0/100 person-years; hazard ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.74-1.25) were observed. Similar results were seen when analysis was limited to standard-dose rivaroxaban. Reduced-dose rivaroxaban was associated with a significantly decreased hazard of stroke or systemic embolism and ischaemic stroke, without an increase in major bleeding risk.
Conclusions: Rivaroxaban has effectiveness and safety at least as good as those of warfarin in people with diabetes and non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated in routine clinical practice.
© 2018 Diabetes UK.