Biomechanical Testing of a 3-Hole Versus a 4-Hole Sliding Hip Screw in the Presence of a Retrograde Intramedullary Nail for Ipsilateral Intertrochanteric and Femur Shaft Fractures

J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Aug;32(8):419-424. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001179.

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to compare a 3-hole versus a 4-hole sliding hip screw (SHS) in the presence of a retrograde intramedullary (RIM) nail for fixing intertrochanteric and comminuted midshaft femur fractures.

Methods: Mechanical tests were performed on 10 matched pairs of human cadaveric femurs that were osteotomized and then fixed using a 3-hole SHS versus the traditional "gold standard" 4-hole SHS in the presence of an RIM nail.

Results: Data showed no differences between the 3-hole SHS with RIM nail versus 4-hole SHS with RIM nail for stiffness (281 ± 127 vs. 260 ± 118 N/mm, P = 0.76), clinical failure at 10 mm of hip displacement (2014 ± 363 vs. 2134 ± 614 N, P = 0.52), or ultimate mechanical failure (3476 ± 776 vs. 3669 ± 755 N, P = 0.12).

Conclusions: For this fracture pattern, a 3-hole SHS with RIM nail may be a suitable surgical alternative to the traditional "gold standard" method because it provides the same biomechanical properties while potentially reducing surgical time, blood loss, and hardware used.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Biomechanical Phenomena
  • Bone Nails*
  • Bone Screws*
  • Cadaver
  • Female
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods*
  • Fractures, Comminuted / diagnosis
  • Fractures, Comminuted / surgery*
  • Hip Fractures / diagnosis
  • Hip Fractures / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Materials Testing / methods*
  • Middle Aged