Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 55, 53-64

Is There Evidence to Use Kinematic/Kinetic Measures Clinically in Low Back Pain Patients? A Systematic Review

Affiliations

Is There Evidence to Use Kinematic/Kinetic Measures Clinically in Low Back Pain Patients? A Systematic Review

Enrica Papi et al. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon).

Abstract

Background: Currently, there is a widespread reliance on self-reported questionnaires to assess low back pain patients. However, it has been suggested that objective measures of low back pain patients' functional status should be used to aid clinical assessment. The aim of this study is to systematically review which kinematic /kinetic parameters have been used to assess low back pain patients against healthy controls and to propose clinical kinematic/kinetic measures.

Methods: PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases were searched for relevant studies. Reference lists of selected studies and hand searches were performed. Studies had to compare people with and without non-specific low back pain while performing functional tasks and report body segment/joint kinematic and/or kinetic data. Two reviewers independently identified relevant papers.

Findings: Sixty-two studies were included. Common biases identified were lack of assessor blinding and sample size calculation, use of samples of convenience, and poor experimental protocol standardization. Studies had small sample sizes. Range of motion maneuvers were the main task performed (33/62). Kinematic/kinetic data of different individual or combination of body segments/joints were reported among the studies, commonest was to assess the hip joint and lumbar segment motion (13/62). Only one study described full body movement. The most commonly reported outcome was range of motion. Statistically significant differences between controls and low back pain groups were reported for different outcomes among the studies. Moreover, when the same outcome was reported disagreements were noted.

Interpretation: The literature to date offers limited and inconsistent evidence of kinematic/kinetic measures in low back pain patients that could be used clinically.

Keywords: Functional assessment; Low back pain; Motion analysis; Movement; Objective measure.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram illustrating the review process (Moher et al., 2009).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a) Overall sample size, (b) participants mean age (top) and age variability expressed as standard deviation (SD) per number of selected articles. In brackets corresponding % of articles is shown.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
(a) Tasks evaluated and (b) equipment used per number of selected articles. In brackets corresponding % of articles is shown.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
(a) Body segment/joint analysed and (b) outcome measures reported per number of selected articles. In brackets corresponding % of articles is show.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 PubMed Central articles

References

    1. Akinpelu A.O., Adeyemi A.I. Range of lumbar flexion in chronic low back pain. Cent. Afr. J. Med. 1989;35:430–432. - PubMed
    1. Al-Eisa E., Egan D., Deluzio K., Wassersug R. Effects of pelvic skeletal asymmetry on trunk movement: three-dimensional analysis in healthy individuals versus patients with mechanical low back pain. Spine. 2006;31(3):E71–79. - PubMed
    1. Al-Eisa E., Egan D., Deluzio K., Wassersug R. Effects of pelvic asymmetry and low back pain on trunk kinematics during sitting: a comparison with standing. Spine. 2006;31(5):E135–143. - PubMed
    1. Aluko A., DeSouza L., Peacock J. Evaluation of trunk acceleration in healthy individuals and those with low back pain. Int. J. Ther. Rehabil. 2011;18:18–25.
    1. Andriacchi T.P., Alexander E.J. Studies of human locomotion: past, present and future. J. Biomech. 2000;33:1217–1224. - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback