No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women's Hormonal Status
- PMID: 29708849
- PMCID: PMC6099988
- DOI: 10.1177/0956797618760197
No Compelling Evidence that Preferences for Facial Masculinity Track Changes in Women's Hormonal Status
Abstract
Although widely cited as strong evidence that sexual selection has shaped human facial-attractiveness judgments, findings suggesting that women's preferences for masculine characteristics in men's faces are related to women's hormonal status are equivocal and controversial. Consequently, we conducted the largest-ever longitudinal study of the hormonal correlates of women's preferences for facial masculinity ( N = 584). Analyses showed no compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity were related to changes in women's salivary steroid hormone levels. Furthermore, both within-subjects and between-subjects comparisons showed no evidence that oral contraceptive use decreased masculinity preferences. However, women generally preferred masculinized over feminized versions of men's faces, particularly when assessing men's attractiveness for short-term, rather than long-term, relationships. Our results do not support the hypothesized link between women's preferences for facial masculinity and their hormonal status.
Keywords: attractiveness; mate preferences; menstrual cycle; open data; open materials; oral contraceptives; sexual selection.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Changes in salivary estradiol predict changes in women's preferences for vocal masculinity.Horm Behav. 2014 Aug;66(3):493-7. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.07.006. Epub 2014 Jul 19. Horm Behav. 2014. PMID: 25051294 Clinical Trial.
-
Pregnant Women's Preferences for Men's Faces Differ Significantly from Nonpregnant Women.J Sex Med. 2015 May;12(5):1142-51. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12849. Epub 2015 Mar 5. J Sex Med. 2015. PMID: 25754377
-
The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness.J Evol Biol. 2016 Nov;29(11):2311-2320. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12958. Epub 2016 Aug 22. J Evol Biol. 2016. PMID: 27488414
-
Evidence for menstrual cycle shifts in women's preferences for masculinity: a response to Harris (in press) “Menstrual cycle and facial preferences reconsidered”.Evol Psychol. 2010 Dec 10;8(4):768-75. doi: 10.1177/147470491000800416. Evol Psychol. 2010. PMID: 22947833 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ovulation, Sex Hormones, and Women's Mating Psychology.Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Jan;23(1):51-62. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.10.008. Epub 2018 Nov 24. Trends Cogn Sci. 2019. PMID: 30477896 Review.
Cited by
-
The Influence of Body Composition Effects on Male Facial Masculinity and Attractiveness.Front Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;9:2658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02658. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 30662423 Free PMC article.
-
No increased inbreeding avoidance during the ovulatory phase of the menstrual cycle.Evol Hum Sci. 2022 Sep 28;4:e47. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2022.41. eCollection 2022. Evol Hum Sci. 2022. PMID: 37588927 Free PMC article.
-
Preeclampsia Argues Against an Ovulatory Shift in Female Mate Preferences.Arch Sex Behav. 2023 Nov;52(8):3171-3176. doi: 10.1007/s10508-023-02691-7. Epub 2023 Sep 6. Arch Sex Behav. 2023. PMID: 37672134 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Sexual orientation predicts men's preferences for sexually dimorphic face-shape characteristics: A replication study.PLoS One. 2020 Nov 13;15(11):e0242262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242262. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33186368 Free PMC article.
-
Menstrual Cycle Variations in Gray Matter Volume, White Matter Volume and Functional Connectivity: Critical Impact on Parietal Lobe.Front Neurosci. 2020 Dec 22;14:594588. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2020.594588. eCollection 2020. Front Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 33414702 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bao A.-M., Liu R.-Y., Van Someren E., Hofman M. A., Cao Y.-X., Zhou J.-N. (2003). Diurnal rhythm of free estradiol during the menstrual cycle. European Journal of Endocrinology, 148, 227–232. - PubMed
-
- Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2014). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using ‘Eigen’ and S4 (R package version 1.1-13). Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/
-
- Blake K. R., Dixson B. J. W., O’Dean S. M., Denson T. F. (2016). Standardized protocols for characterizing women’s fertility: A data-driven approach. Hormones and Behavior, 81, 74–83. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
