Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 44 (2), 59-65

Three-dimensional Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis of Dental Implant Thread Parameters Using Finite Element Analysis

Affiliations

Three-dimensional Optimization and Sensitivity Analysis of Dental Implant Thread Parameters Using Finite Element Analysis

Maryam Geramizadeh et al. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to optimize the thread depth and pitch of a recently designed dental implant to provide uniform stress distribution by means of a response surface optimization method available in finite element (FE) software. The sensitivity of simulation to different mechanical parameters was also evaluated.

Materials and methods: A three-dimensional model of a tapered dental implant with micro-threads in the upper area and V-shaped threads in the rest of the body was modeled and analyzed using finite element analysis (FEA). An axial load of 100 N was applied to the top of the implants. The model was optimized for thread depth and pitch to determine the optimal stress distribution. In this analysis, micro-threads had 0.25 to 0.3 mm depth and 0.27 to 0.33 mm pitch, and V-shaped threads had 0.405 to 0.495 mm depth and 0.66 to 0.8 mm pitch.

Results: The optimized depth and pitch were 0.307 and 0.286 mm for micro-threads and 0.405 and 0.808 mm for V-shaped threads, respectively. In this design, the most effective parameters on stress distribution were the depth and pitch of the micro-threads based on sensitivity analysis results.

Conclusion: Based on the results of this study, the optimal implant design has micro-threads with 0.307 and 0.286 mm depth and pitch, respectively, in the upper area and V-shaped threads with 0.405 and 0.808 mm depth and pitch in the rest of the body. These results indicate that micro-thread parameters have a greater effect on stress and strain values.

Keywords: Biomechanics; Dental implants; Finite element; Optimization; Thread design.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Implant model and the whole model.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Iterations of solving the problem to find the perfect candidates to optimize the chosen parameters.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Three candidate points for output results (P1: microthread depth, P2: V-shaped thread depth, P3: micro-thread pitch, P4: V-shaped thread pitch, P5: maximum von-Mises stress, P6: maximum von-Mises strain).
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Consideration of stress and strain quantities to find the best points to minimize both (green zone).
Fig. 5
Fig. 5. Sensitivity analysis of maximum stress and strain with respect to the four input parameters.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Gosavi SP, Dhatrak PN, Narkar KM. Optimisation of dental implant. Int Eng Res J. 2015;3:4319–4323.
    1. Brunski JB. Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:85–97. - PubMed
    1. Mahajan S, Patil R. Application of finite element analysis to optimizing dental implant. Int Res J Eng Technol. 2016;3:850–856.
    1. Kong L, Zhao Y, Hu K, Li D, Zhou H, Wu Z, et al. Selection of the implant thread pitch for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Adv Eng Softw. 2009;40:474–478.
    1. Petrie CS, Williams JL. Shape optimization of dental implant designs under oblique loading using the p-version finite element method. J Mech Med Biol. 2002;3:339.
Feedback