Prediction intervals for random-effects meta-analysis: A confidence distribution approach

Stat Methods Med Res. 2019 Jun;28(6):1689-1702. doi: 10.1177/0962280218773520. Epub 2018 May 10.

Abstract

Prediction intervals are commonly used in meta-analysis with random-effects models. One widely used method, the Higgins-Thompson-Spiegelhalter prediction interval, replaces the heterogeneity parameter with its point estimate, but its validity strongly depends on a large sample approximation. This is a weakness in meta-analyses with few studies. We propose an alternative based on bootstrap and show by simulations that its coverage is close to the nominal level, unlike the Higgins-Thompson-Spiegelhalter method and its extensions. The proposed method was applied in three meta-analyses.

Keywords: Confidence distributions; coverage properties; meta-analysis; prediction intervals; random-effects models.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Confidence Intervals*
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical*
  • Humans
  • Meta-Analysis as Topic*
  • Models, Statistical
  • Probability
  • Treatment Outcome