Raman biophysical markers in skin cancer diagnosis
- PMID: 29752800
- DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.23.5.057002
Raman biophysical markers in skin cancer diagnosis
Abstract
Raman spectroscopy (RS) has demonstrated great potential for in vivo cancer screening; however, the biophysical changes that occur for specific diagnoses remain unclear. We recently developed an inverse biophysical skin cancer model to address this issue. Here, we presented the first demonstration of in vivo melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) detection based on this model. We fit the model to our previous clinical dataset and extracted the concentration of eight Raman active components in 100 lesions in 65 patients diagnosed with malignant melanoma (MM), dysplastic nevi (DN), basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and actinic keratosis. We then used logistic regression and leave-one-lesion-out cross validation to determine the diagnostically relevant model components. Our results showed that the biophysical model captures the diagnostic power of the previously used statistical classification model while also providing the skin's biophysical composition. In addition, collagen and triolein were the most relevant biomarkers to represent the spectral variances between MM and DN, and between NMSC and normal tissue. Our work demonstrates the ability of RS to reveal the biophysical basis for accurate diagnosis of different skin cancers, which may eventually lead to a reduction in the number of unnecessary excisional skin biopsies performed.
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; biophysical marker; diagnosis; optical sensing; skin cancer.
(2018) COPYRIGHT Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).
Similar articles
-
Clinical study of noninvasive in vivo melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancers using multimodal spectral diagnosis.J Biomed Opt. 2014;19(11):117003. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.19.11.117003. J Biomed Opt. 2014. PMID: 25375350 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Raman Spectroscopy for Reducing Unnecessary Biopsies for Melanoma Screening.Molecules. 2020 Jun 20;25(12):2852. doi: 10.3390/molecules25122852. Molecules. 2020. PMID: 32575717 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo study for the discrimination of cancerous and normal skin using fibre probe-based Raman spectroscopy.Exp Dermatol. 2015 Oct;24(10):767-72. doi: 10.1111/exd.12768. Epub 2015 Jul 6. Exp Dermatol. 2015. PMID: 26010742
-
Role of In Vivo Reflectance Confocal Microscopy in the Analysis of Melanocytic Lesions.Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018 Apr;26(1):64-67. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2018. PMID: 29782304 Review.
-
Using Raman Spectroscopy to Detect and Diagnose Skin Cancer In Vivo.Dermatol Clin. 2017 Oct;35(4):495-504. doi: 10.1016/j.det.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Aug 9. Dermatol Clin. 2017. PMID: 28886805 Review.
Cited by
-
Non-invasive 3D imaging of human melanocytic lesions by combined ultrasound and photoacoustic tomography: a pilot study.Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 2;14(1):2768. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53220-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38307985 Free PMC article.
-
From Vibrations to Visions: Raman Spectroscopy's Impact on Skin Cancer Diagnostics.J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 30;12(23):7428. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237428. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 38068480 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Combined ultrasound and photoacoustic C-mode imaging system for skin lesion assessment.Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 20;13(1):17947. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-44919-5. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37864039 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular Fingerprint Detection Using Raman and Infrared Spectroscopy Technologies for Cancer Detection: A Progress Review.Biosensors (Basel). 2023 May 18;13(5):557. doi: 10.3390/bios13050557. Biosensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37232918 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) by gold nanoparticle characterizes dermal thickening by collagen in bleomycin-treated skin ex vivo.Skin Res Technol. 2023 May;29(5):e13334. doi: 10.1111/srt.13334. Skin Res Technol. 2023. PMID: 37231930 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
