Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 12, 22

Systematic Review: Cultural Adaptation and Feasibility of Screening for Autism in non-English Speaking Countries


Systematic Review: Cultural Adaptation and Feasibility of Screening for Autism in non-English Speaking Countries

Turkiya S Al Maskari et al. Int J Ment Health Syst.


Background: Screening children for autism has gained wider acceptance within clinical practice, and early intervention has improved outcomes. Increasingly, adapting an existing screening instrument is a common, fast method to create a usable screening tool, especially for countries with limited resources and/or expertise. However, concerns have been raised regarding adaptation adequacy and the feasibility of screening across cultural groups. This study systematically examined the levels of cultural adaptation and feasibility aspects considered when screening for autism in non-English speaking countries to build upon the sparse knowledge that exists on this topic in the literature.

Methods: Nineteen studies, obtained from five electronic databases, were examined. PRISMA guidance was used for this review. The Ecological Validity Framework model, and Bowen Recommendations for Feasibility were adopted to extract relevant data, which was synthesised narratively.

Results: Cultural adaptation within the included studies mostly involved language translation with little information offered to enable conclusions on how the processes were guided and maintained. Few cultural adjustments involved modifying screening methods; clarifying difficult concepts and changing instrument content were employed to address the core values, competence, beliefs, and norms of the adapted culture. However, less attention was given to adapt the screening goals within the context of cultural values, and customs or to consider interactional match between the clients and assessors. The review also highlighted an acceptable level of practicality to screen for autism but did not encourage integrating autism screening within routine practice or beyond the study context for different cultures.

Conclusion: Concurring with previous literature, we agree that knowledge on cultural adaptation for autism screening instruments is limited and not sufficiently documented to establish adaptation levels (process and/or contents), and prove adequacy. However, this review provides an infrastructure to improve future adaptation processes. Integrating autism screening as routine medical practice is not encouraged and warrants further feasibility studies to minimize wasted resources and improve screening effectiveness in various health care systems.


Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Selection process using PRISMA 2009 flow diagram

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 3 PubMed Central articles


    1. Boyd BA, et al. Infants and toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: early identification and early intervention. J Early Interv. 2010;32(2):75–98. doi: 10.1177/1053815110362690. - DOI
    1. Filipek PA, et al. The screening and diagnosis of autistic spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Disord. 1999;29(6):439–484. doi: 10.1023/A:1021943802493. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baron-Cohen S, et al. Early identification of autism by the CHecklist for Autism in Toddlers (CHAT) J R Soc Med. 2000;93(10):521–525. doi: 10.1177/014107680009301007. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blackwell PB. Screening young children for autism and other social-communication disorders. J Ky Med Assoc. 2002;100(9):390–394. - PubMed
    1. Robins DL. Screening for autism spectrum disorders in primary care settings. Autism. 2008;12(5):537–556. doi: 10.1177/1362361308094502. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources