Increases in Sugary Drink Marketing During Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Issuance in New York
- PMID: 29776786
- PMCID: PMC6128139
- DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.03.012
Increases in Sugary Drink Marketing During Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Issuance in New York
Abstract
Introduction: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is the largest federal food assistance program, providing $67 billion in benefits to 44 million Americans. Some states distribute SNAP benefits over one or a few days each month, which may create an incentive for retailers to heavily promote top-selling products, like sugar-sweetened beverages, when benefits are disbursed.
Methods: A beverage environment scan assessing presence of displays, advertisements, and price promotions for sugar-sweetened, low-calorie, and unsweetened beverages was administered in a census of SNAP-authorized beverage retailers (n=630) in three cities in New York from September to November 2011. Multilevel regression models controlling for store type; county; and percentage SNAP enrollment, poverty, and non-Hispanic white population in the store's census tract were used to estimate the odds of in-store beverage marketing during the SNAP benefit issuance period compared to other days of the month. Data were analyzed in 2016.
Results: There were higher odds of in-store sugar-sweetened beverage marketing during SNAP benefit issuance days (first to ninth days of the month) compared with other days of the month, particularly for sugar-sweetened beverage advertisements (OR=1.66, 95% CI=1.01, 2.72) and displays (OR=1.88, 95% CI=1.16, 3.03). In census tracts with high SNAP enrollment (>28%), the odds of a retailer having sugar-sweetened beverage displays were 4.35 times higher (95% CI=1.93, 9.98) during issuance compared with non-issuance days. There were no differences in marketing for low-calorie or unsweetened beverages.
Conclusions: Increases in sugar-sweetened beverage marketing during issuance may exacerbate disparities in diet quality of households participating in SNAP. Policy changes, like extending SNAP benefit issuance, may mitigate these effects.
Copyright © 2018 American Journal of Preventive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Grocery store beverage choices by participants in federal food assistance and nutrition programs.Am J Prev Med. 2012 Oct;43(4):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.06.015. Am J Prev Med. 2012. PMID: 22992359
-
Sugary Drink Consumption Among Children by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Status.Am J Prev Med. 2020 Jan;58(1):69-78. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.08.033. Epub 2019 Nov 21. Am J Prev Med. 2020. PMID: 31761517
-
Nutritional profile of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program household food and beverage purchases.Am J Clin Nutr. 2017 Jun;105(6):1433-1442. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.147173. Epub 2017 Apr 19. Am J Clin Nutr. 2017. PMID: 28424188 Free PMC article.
-
The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program: Analysis of Program Administration and Food Law Definitions.Am J Prev Med. 2015 Sep;49(3):428-36. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.02.027. Epub 2015 Jun 16. Am J Prev Med. 2015. PMID: 26091926 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Associations between Governmental Policies to Improve the Nutritional Quality of Supermarket Purchases and Individual, Retailer, and Community Health Outcomes: An Integrative Review.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 15;17(20):7493. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207493. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33076280 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by 12 articles
-
Improving Healthy Food Choices in Low-Income Settings in the United States Using Behavioral Economic-Based Adaptations to Choice Architecture.Front Nutr. 2021 Oct 6;8:734991. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.734991. eCollection 2021. Front Nutr. 2021. PMID: 34692747 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Philadelphia's Excise Tax on Sugar-Sweetened and Artificially Sweetened Beverages and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Benefit Redemption.Am J Public Health. 2021 Nov;111(11):1986-1996. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306464. Epub 2021 Oct 22. Am J Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34678053
-
An Exploration of the Role of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage in Promoting Obesity and Health Disparities.Curr Obes Rep. 2021 Mar;10(1):39-52. doi: 10.1007/s13679-020-00421-x. Epub 2021 Jan 7. Curr Obes Rep. 2021. PMID: 33411311 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A rapid review of stocking and marketing practices used to sell sugar-sweetened beverages in U.S. food stores.Obes Rev. 2021 Apr;22(4):e13179. doi: 10.1111/obr.13179. Epub 2020 Dec 16. Obes Rev. 2021. PMID: 33331094 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Developing a National Research Agenda to Support Healthy Food Retail.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 4;17(21):8141. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218141. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 33158134 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grant support
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
