X-Ray Exposure in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Retrospective Analysis in 8150 Patients Over 7 Years of Activity in a Modern, Large-Volume Laboratory

J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 22;7(11):e008233. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008233.

Abstract

Background: Only a few studies have systematically evaluated fluoroscopy data of electrophysiological and device implantation procedures. Aims of this study were to quantify ionizing radiation exposure for electrophysiological/device implantation procedures in a large series of patients and to analyze the x-ray exposure trend over years and radiation exposure in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation considering different technical aspects.

Methods and results: We performed a retrospective analysis of all electrophysiological/device implantation procedures performed during the past 7 years in a modern, large-volume laboratory. We reported complete fluoroscopy data on 8150 electrophysiological/device implantation procedures (6095 electrophysiological and 2055 device implantation procedures); for each type of procedure, effective dose and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence and mortality were calculated. Over the 7-year period, we observed a significant trend reduction in fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and effective dose for all electrophysiological procedures (P<0.001) and a not statistically significant trend reduction for device implantation procedures. Analyzing 2416 atrial fibrillation ablations, we observed a significant variability of fluoroscopy time, dose area product and effective dose among 7 different experienced operators (P<0.0001) and a significant reduction of fluoroscopy use over time (P<0.0001) for all of them. Considering atrial fibrillation ablation techniques, fluoroscopy time was not different (P = 0.74) for radiofrequency catheter ablation in comparison with cryoablation, though cryoablation was still associated with higher dose area product and effective dose values (P<0.001).

Conclusions: Electrophysiological procedures involve a nonnegligible x-ray use, leading to an increased risk of malignancy. Awareness of radiation-related risk, together with technological advances, can successfully optimize fluoroscopy use.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; x‐ray.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / diagnosis
  • Arrhythmias, Cardiac / therapy*
  • Cardiac Catheterization* / adverse effects
  • Catheter Ablation / adverse effects
  • Cryosurgery / adverse effects
  • Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac / adverse effects
  • Female
  • Fluoroscopy / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Occupational Exposure* / adverse effects
  • Occupational Health
  • Operative Time
  • Prosthesis Implantation / adverse effects
  • Radiation Dosage*
  • Radiation Exposure* / adverse effects
  • Radiography, Interventional* / adverse effects
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors