Perspectives on Electronic Informed Consent From Patients Underrepresented in Research in the United States: A Focus Group Study

J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2018 Oct;13(4):338-348. doi: 10.1177/1556264618773883. Epub 2018 May 23.

Abstract

Digital informed consent may better inform individuals about health research and increase participation. In the United States and elsewhere, minorities and rural populations are underrepresented in health research and may benefit from well-designed electronic informed consent (eIC). Seven focus groups were conducted with 50 Caucasian, African American, and rural patients in the United States. Participants were asked their preferences for a paper versus electronic informed consent document. Participants found the e-version easier to use, more interesting, and better for understanding. Minority participants emphasized limited access, computer literacy, and trust barriers to eIC. Rural participants were concerned about accessibility, connectivity, privacy, and confidentiality. People see value in electronic consenting. Researchers should consider barriers to eIC among underrepresented populations before recruitment.

Keywords: diverse populations; eIC; informed consent; interactive multimedia.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Attitude*
  • Black or African American
  • Computer Literacy
  • Confidentiality
  • Consent Forms*
  • Female
  • Focus Groups
  • Humans
  • Informed Consent*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minority Groups
  • Paper
  • Privacy
  • Research*
  • Rural Population
  • Telemedicine*
  • United States
  • White People