Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr;76(2):325-338.
doi: 10.1177/0013164415576958. Epub 2015 Apr 1.

On the Relationship Between Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory: From One to the Other and Back

Affiliations

On the Relationship Between Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory: From One to the Other and Back

Tenko Raykov et al. Educ Psychol Meas. 2016 Apr.

Abstract

The frequently neglected and often misunderstood relationship between classical test theory and item response theory is discussed for the unidimensional case with binary measures and no guessing. It is pointed out that popular item response models can be directly obtained from classical test theory-based models by accounting for the discrete nature of the observed items. Two distinct observational equivalence approaches are outlined that render the item response models from corresponding classical test theory-based models, and can each be used to obtain the former from the latter models. Similarly, classical test theory models can be furnished using the reverse application of either of those approaches from corresponding item response models.

Keywords: binary item; classical test theory; item response theory; observational equivalence; unidimensionality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agresti A. (2002). Categorical data analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
    1. Apostol T. M. (2013). Calculus. New York, NY: Wiley.
    1. Bartholomew D. J., Knott M., Moustaki I. (2011). Latent variable models and factor analysis. New York, NY: Wiley.
    1. de Ayala R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
    1. Jöreskog K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36, 109-133.

LinkOut - more resources