Association of BRAF Mutations With Survival and Recurrence in Surgically Treated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Liver Cancer
- PMID: 29799910
- PMCID: PMC6137519
- DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0996
Association of BRAF Mutations With Survival and Recurrence in Surgically Treated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Liver Cancer
Abstract
Importance: BRAF mutations are reportedly associated with aggressive tumor biology. However, in contrast with primary colorectal cancer, the association of V600E and non-V600E BRAF mutations with survival and recurrence after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has not been well studied.
Objective: To investigate the prognostic association of BRAF mutations with survival and recurrence independently and compared with other prognostic determinants, such as KRAS mutations.
Design, setting, and participants: In this cohort study, all patients who underwent resection for CRLM with curative intent from January 1, 2000, through December 31, 2016, at the institutions participating in the International Genetic Consortium for Colorectal Liver Metastasis and had data on BRAF and KRAS mutational status were retrospectively identified. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess long-term outcomes.
Interventions: Hepatectomy in patients with CRLM.
Main outcomes and measures: The association of V600E and non-V600E BRAF mutations with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results: Of 853 patients who met inclusion criteria (510 men [59.8%] and 343 women [40.2%]; mean [SD] age, 60.2 [12.4] years), 849 were included in the study analyses. Forty-three (5.1%) had a mutated (mut) BRAF/wild-type (wt) KRAS (V600E and non-V600E) genotype; 480 (56.5%), a wtBRAF/wtKRAS genotype; and 326 (38.4%), a wtBRAF/mutKRAS genotype. Compared with the wtBRAF/wtKRAS genotype group, patients with a mutBRAF/wtKRAS genotype more frequently were female (27 [62.8%] vs 169 [35.2%]) and 65 years or older (22 [51.2%] vs 176 [36.9%]), had right-sided primary tumors (27 [62.8%] vs 83 [17.4%]), and presented with a metachronous liver metastasis (28 [64.3%] vs 229 [46.8%]). On multivariable analysis, V600E but not non-V600E BRAF mutation was associated with worse OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.76; 95% CI, 1.74-4.37; P < .001) and DFS (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.30-3.20; P = .002). The V600E BRAF mutation had a stronger association with OS and DFS than the KRAS mutations (β for OS, 10.15 vs 2.94; β for DFS, 7.14 vs 2.27).
Conclusions and relevance: The presence of the V600E BRAF mutation was associated with worse prognosis and increased risk of recurrence. The V600E mutation was not only a stronger prognostic factor than KRAS but also was the strongest prognostic determinant in the overall cohort.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
BRAF V600E Mutation as a Negative Prognostic Determinant in Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases-Reply.JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):1163-1164. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3339. JAMA Surg. 2018. PMID: 30208387 No abstract available.
-
BRAF V600E Mutation as a Negative Prognostic Determinant in Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases.JAMA Surg. 2018 Dec 1;153(12):1162-1163. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.3334. JAMA Surg. 2018. PMID: 30208388 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis: Prognostic Impact of Tumor Burden vs KRAS Mutational Status.J Am Coll Surg. 2021 Apr;232(4):590-598. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.11.023. Epub 2020 Dec 28. J Am Coll Surg. 2021. PMID: 33383214
-
Association Between Specific Mutations in KRAS Codon 12 and Colorectal Liver Metastasis.JAMA Surg. 2015 Aug;150(8):722-9. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.0313. JAMA Surg. 2015. PMID: 26038887 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical significance and prognostic relevance of KRAS, BRAF, PI3K and TP53 genetic mutation analysis for resectable and unresectable colorectal liver metastases: A systematic review of the current evidence.Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;27(2):280-288. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.012. Epub 2018 May 8. Surg Oncol. 2018. PMID: 29937183 Review.
-
Effect of KRAS Mutation on Long-Term Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases.Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Dec;22(13):4158-65. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4587-z. Epub 2015 Jun 16. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015. PMID: 26077912
-
Effect of KRAS and BRAF Mutations on Survival of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Liver Resection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017 Sep;16(3):e153-e163. doi: 10.1016/j.clcc.2017.01.004. Epub 2017 Jan 25. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2017. PMID: 28216246 Review.
Cited by
-
Development and validation of a clinical prognostic model for BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal cancer patients based on pathological stage, microsatellite status, and primary tumor site.Front Oncol. 2024 Oct 11;14:1461237. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1461237. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39464719 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Combinations of Biological and Clinicopathologic Factors Linked to Poor Outcomes in Resected Colorectal Liver Metastasis: An External Validation Study.Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Oct 8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16319-0. Online ahead of print. Ann Surg Oncol. 2024. PMID: 39377842
-
Hepatectomy versus systemic therapy for liver-limited BRAF V600E-mutated colorectal liver metastases: multicentre retrospective study.Br J Surg. 2024 Jul 2;111(7):znae176. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae176. Br J Surg. 2024. PMID: 39051667
-
Challenges and Opportunities for Precision Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 28;16(13):2379. doi: 10.3390/cancers16132379. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39001441 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Construction and validation of "WCH-nomogram" for predicting the prognosis after resection of colorectal liver metastases.Cancer Med. 2024 May;13(9):e7222. doi: 10.1002/cam4.7222. Cancer Med. 2024. PMID: 38698687 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Margonis GA, Kim Y, Sasaki K, Samaha M, Amini N, Pawlik TM. Codon 13 KRAS mutation predicts patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases. Cancer. 2016;122(17):2698-2707. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Molecular Biology Databases
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
