Assessment of Clinical and Social Characteristics That Distinguish Presbylaryngis From Pathologic Presbyphonia in Elderly Individuals
- PMID: 29799925
- PMCID: PMC6583846
- DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0409
Assessment of Clinical and Social Characteristics That Distinguish Presbylaryngis From Pathologic Presbyphonia in Elderly Individuals
Abstract
Importance: An aging population experiences an increase in age-related problems, such as presbyphonia. The causes of pathologic presbyphonia are incompletely understood.
Objective: To determine what distinguishes pathologic presbyphonia from presbylaryngis.
Design, setting, and participants: This was a cohort study at an outpatient otolaryngology subspecialty clinic of a tertiary academic referral center. Participants were consecutive consenting adults older than 74 years without laryngeal pathologic abnormalities who visited the clinic as participants or companions. Patient questionnaires, otolaryngologic, video stroboscopic, and voice examinations were compiled. Patients were divided into groups based on whether they endorsed a voice complaint. Three blinded authors graded stroboscopic examinations for findings consistent with presbylaryngis (vocal fold bowing, vocal process prominence, glottic insufficiency).
Main outcomes and measures: Voice Handicap Index-10, Reflux Symptom Index, Cough Severity Index, Dyspnea Index, Singing Voice Handicap Index-10 , Eating Assessment Tool -10, Voice-Related Quality of Life (VRQOL), and Short-Form Health Survey; face-sheet addressing social situation, work, marital status, education, voice use, transportation; acoustic and aerodynamic measures; and a full otolaryngologic examination, including videostroboscopic imaging.
Results: A total of 31 participants with dysphonia (21 were female; their mean age was 83 years [range, 75-97 years]) and 26 control participants (16 were female; their mean age was 81 years [range, 75-103 years]) completed the study. Presbylaryngis was visible in 27 patients with dysphonia (87%) and 22 controls (85%). VHI-10 and VRQOL scores were worse in patients with pathologic presbyphonia (median [range] VHI-10 scores, 15 (0-40) vs 0 (0-16) and median VRQOL score, 19 [0-43] vs 10 [10-23]). All other survey results were indistinguishable, and no social differences were elucidated. Acoustic measures revealed that both groups averaged lower than normal speaking fundamental frequency (mean [SD], 150.01 [36.23] vs 150.85 [38.00]). Jitter was 3.44% (95% CI, 2.46%-4.61%) for pathologic presbyphonia and 1.74% (95% CI, 1.35%-2.14%) for controls (d = 0.75). Shimmer means (95% CI) were 7.8 2 (6.08-10.06) for the pathologic presbyphonia group and 4.84 (3.94-5.72) for controls (d = 0.69). Aerodynamic measures revealed an odds ratio of 3.03 (95% CI, 0.83-11.04) for patients with a maximum phonation time of less than 12 seconds who had complaints about dysphonia.
Conclusions and relevance: Presbylaryngis is present in most ambulatory people older than 74 years. Some will endorse pathologic presbyphonia that has a negative effect on their voice and quality of life. Pathologic presbyphonia seems to be influenced by respiratory capacity and sex. Further study is required to isolate other social, physiologic, and general health characteristics that contribute to pathologic presbyphonia.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
The Voice and the Larynx in Older Adults: What's Normal, and Who Decides?JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Jul 1;144(7):572-573. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2018.0412. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018. PMID: 29799923 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Correlation of Glottic Gap and Voice Impairment in Presbyphonia.Laryngoscope. 2021 Jul;131(7):1594-1598. doi: 10.1002/lary.29068. Epub 2020 Sep 9. Laryngoscope. 2021. PMID: 32902880
-
Objective Evaluation of Presbyphonia: Spectroacoustic Study on 142 Patients with Praat.J Voice. 2017 Mar;31(2):257.e25-257.e32. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2016.05.022. Epub 2016 Jul 15. J Voice. 2017. PMID: 27427181 Clinical Trial.
-
Vocal Dose in Older Adults with Presbyphonia: An Analytic, Cross-Sectional Study.J Voice. 2020 Mar;34(2):221-230. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Oct 12. J Voice. 2020. PMID: 30322822
-
Presbyphonia and Minimal Glottic Insufficiency.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019 Aug;52(4):617-625. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 May 6. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2019. PMID: 31072642 Review.
-
Presbylaryngis: a state-of-the-art review.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Jun;27(3):168-177. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000540. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019. PMID: 30920986 Review.
Cited by
-
Age and sex-related variations in murine laryngeal microbiota.PLoS One. 2024 May 14;19(5):e0300672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300672. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38743725 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review of Speech-Language Pathology Interventions for Presbyphonia Using the Rehabilitation Treatment Specification System.J Voice. 2024 Jan 8:S0892-1997(23)00396-X. doi: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2023.12.010. Online ahead of print. J Voice. 2024. PMID: 38195333
-
Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in benign vocal fold lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Jan;281(1):13-21. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-08226-z. Epub 2023 Sep 14. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024. PMID: 37709923 Review.
-
Analysis of the singing voice handicap index for elderly choristers.Codas. 2021 Oct 25;34(1):e20200302. doi: 10.1590/2317-1782/20212020302. eCollection 2021. Codas. 2021. PMID: 34705924 Free PMC article.
-
The aging voice: a systematic review of presbyphonia.Eur Geriatr Med. 2018 Oct;9(5):559-570. doi: 10.1007/s41999-018-0095-6. Epub 2018 Sep 3. Eur Geriatr Med. 2018. PMID: 34654233 Review.
References
-
- Ryu CH, Han S, Lee MS, et al. . voice changes in elderly adults: prevalence and the effect of social, behavioral, and health status on voice quality. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(8):1608-1614. - PubMed
-
- Golub JS, Chen PH, Otto KJ, Hapner E, Johns MM III. Prevalence of perceived dysphonia in a geriatric population. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(11):1736-1739. - PubMed
-
- Roy N, Kim J, Courey M, Cohen SM. Voice disorders in the elderly: a national database study. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(2):421-428. - PubMed
-
- de Araújo Pernambuco L, Espelt A, Balata PM, de Lima KC. Prevalence of voice disorders in the elderly: a systematic review of population-based studies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015;272(10):2601-2609. - PubMed
-
- Coyle SM, Weinrich BD, Stemple JC. Shifts in relative prevalence of laryngeal pathology in a treatment-seeking population. J Voice. 2001;15(3):424-440. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
