Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 1;25(9):1189-1196.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy058.

Hospitals' adoption of intra-system information exchange is negatively associated with inter-system information exchange

Affiliations

Hospitals' adoption of intra-system information exchange is negatively associated with inter-system information exchange

Joshua R Vest et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Introduction: U.S. policy on interoperable HIT has focused on increasing inter-system (ie, between different organizations) health information exchange. However, interoperable HIT also supports the movement of information within the same organization (ie, intra-system exchange).

Methods: We examined the relationship between hospitals' intra- and inter-system information exchange capabilities among health system hospitals included in the 2010-2014 American Hospital Association's Annual Health Information Technology Survey. We described the factors associated with hospitals that adopted more intra-system than inter-system exchange capability, and explored the extent of new capability adoption among hospitals that reported neither intra- or inter-system information capabilities at baseline.

Results: The prevalence of exchange increased over time, but the adoption of inter-system information exchange was slower; when hospitals adopt information exchange, adoption of intra-system exchange was more common. On average during our study period, hospitals could share 4.6 types of information by intra-system exchange, but only 2.7 types of information by inter-system exchange. Controlling for other factors, hospitals exchanged more types of information in an intra-system manner than inter-system when the number of different inpatient EHR vendors in use in health system is larger.

Conclusion: Consistent with the U.S. goals for more widely accessible patient information, hospitals' ability to share information has increased over time. However, hospitals are prioritizing within-organizational information exchange over exchange between different organizations. If increasing inter-system exchanges is a desired goal, current market incentives and government policies may be insufficient to overcome hospitals' motivations for pursuing an intra-system-information-exchange-first strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Trends in general acute care and specialty hospitals’ intra-system information sharing and inter-system information exchange capability, 2010 to 2014.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. The White House. Transforming health care: the president’s health information technology plan. Promoting Innovation and Competitiveness. President Bush’s Technology Agenda. 2004. http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/technology/economic_p....
    1. Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. The ONC-Coordinated Federal Health IT Strategic Plan: 2008–2012. Washington, DC: Department of Health & Human Services; 2008.
    1. Iacovou CL, Benbasat I, Dexter AS.. Electronic data interchange and small organizations: adoption and impact of technology. MIS Q 1995; 194: 465–85.
    1. Stewart BA, Fernandes S, Rodriguez-Huertas E, Landzberg M.. A preliminary look at duplicate testing associated with lack of electronic health record interoperability for transferred patients. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2010; 173: 341–4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeSalvo KB, Dinkler AN, Stevens L.. The US office of the national coordinator for health information technology: progress and promise for the future at the 10-year mark. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 665: 507–10. - PubMed

Publication types