Design of healthy hearts in the heartland (H3): A practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study
- PMID: 29870868
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.004
Design of healthy hearts in the heartland (H3): A practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study
Abstract
Background: The Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3) study is part of a nationwide effort, EvidenceNOW, seeking to better understand the ability of small primary care practices to improve "ABCS" clinical quality measures: appropriate Aspirin therapy, Blood pressure control, Cholesterol management, and Smoking cessation. H3 aimed to assess feasibility of implementing Point-of-Care (POC) or POC plus Population Management (POC + PM) quality improvement (QI) strategies to improve ABCS at practices in Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin. We describe the design and randomization of the H3 study.
Methods: We conducted a two-arm (1:1, POC:POC + PM), practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study in 226 primary care practices across four "waves" of randomization with a 12-month intervention period, followed by a six-month sustainability period. Randomization controlled imbalance in nine baseline variables through a modified constrained algorithm. Among others, we used initial, unverified estimates of baseline ABCS values.
Results: We randomized 112 and 114 practices to POC and POC + PM arms, respectively. Randomization ensured baseline comparability for all nine key variables, including the ABCS measures indicating proportion of patients at the practice level meeting each quality measure. Median(Inner Quartile Range) values were A: 0.78(0.66-0.86) in POC arm vs. 0.77(0.63-0.86) in POC + PM arm, B: 0.64(0.53-0.73) vs. 0.64(0.53-0.75), C: 0.78(0.63-0.86) vs. 0.75(0.64-0.81), S: 0.80(0.65-0.81) vs. 0.79(0.61-0.91).
Discussion: Surrogate estimates for the true ABCS at baseline coupled with the unique randomization logic achieved adequate baseline balance on these outcomes. Similar practice- or cluster-randomized trials may consider adaptations of this design. Final analyses on 12- and 18-month ABCS outcomes for the H3 study are forthcoming.
Trial registration: This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Initial post: 11/05/2015; identifier: NCT02598284; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02598284?term=NCT02598284&rank=1).
Keywords: Cardiovascular health; Constrained randomization; Covariate; Quality improvement.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Effects of 2 Forms of Practice Facilitation on Cardiovascular Prevention in Primary Care: A Practice-randomized, Comparative Effectiveness Trial.Med Care. 2020 Apr;58(4):344-351. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001260. Med Care. 2020. PMID: 31876643 Clinical Trial.
-
Differences in Use of Clinical Decision Support Tools and Implementation of Aspirin, Blood Pressure Control, Cholesterol Management, and Smoking Cessation Quality Metrics in Small Practices by Race and Sex.JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2326905. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.26905. JAMA Netw Open. 2023. PMID: 37531106 Free PMC article.
-
Disseminating, implementing, and evaluating patient-centered outcomes to improve cardiovascular care using a stepped-wedge design: healthy hearts for Oklahoma.BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3189-4. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018. PMID: 29866120 Free PMC article.
-
Digital interventions for hypertension and asthma to support patient self-management in primary care: the DIPSS research programme including two RCTs [Internet].Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2022 Dec. Southampton (UK): National Institute for Health and Care Research; 2022 Dec. PMID: 36538606 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Point-of-care testing for assessment of adequacy of oral antiplatelet therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease.Future Cardiol. 2010 May;6(3):289-99. doi: 10.2217/fca.10.20. Future Cardiol. 2010. PMID: 20462336 Review.
Cited by
-
Rationale and design for Healthy Hearts for Michigan (HH4M): A pragmatic single-arm hybrid effectiveness-implementation study.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Aug 21;35:101199. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101199. eCollection 2023 Oct. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023. PMID: 37671245 Free PMC article.
-
Is more better? The impact of implementing more interventions for hypertension control in a practice facilitation study for small- and medium-sized practices.J Hum Hypertens. 2023 Nov;37(11):1007-1014. doi: 10.1038/s41371-023-00813-1. Epub 2023 Mar 22. J Hum Hypertens. 2023. PMID: 36949284 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonist Prescribing in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus With and Without Cardiovascular Disease.Am J Cardiol. 2023 Feb 15;189:121-130. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.10.041. Epub 2022 Nov 22. Am J Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36424193 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying Contextual Factors and Strategies for Practice Facilitation in Primary Care Quality Improvement Using an Informatics-Driven Model: Framework Development and Mixed Methods Case Study.JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jun 24;9(2):e32174. doi: 10.2196/32174. JMIR Hum Factors. 2022. PMID: 35749211 Free PMC article.
-
A Cohort Analysis of Statin Treatment Patterns Among Small-Sized Primary Care Practices.J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1845-1852. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07191-9. Epub 2022 Jan 8. J Gen Intern Med. 2022. PMID: 34997391 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
