A systematic review and meta-analysis of the direct epidemiological and economic effects of seasonal influenza vaccination on healthcare workers

PLoS One. 2018 Jun 7;13(6):e0198685. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0198685. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Background: Influenza vaccination is a commonly used intervention to prevent influenza infection in healthcare workers (HCWs) and onward transmission to other staff and patients. We undertook a systematic review to synthesize the latest evidence of the direct epidemiological and economic effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccination among HCW.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1980 through January 2018. All studies comparing vaccinated and non-vaccinated (i.e. placebo or non-intervention) groups of HCWs were included. Research articles that focused on only patient-related outcomes or monovalent A(H1N1)pdm09 vaccines were excluded. Two reviewers independently selected articles and extracted data. Pooled-analyses were conducted on morbidity outcomes including laboratory-confirmed influenza, influenza-like illnesses (ILI), and absenteeism. Economic studies were summarized for the characteristics of methods and findings.

Results: Thirteen articles met eligibility criteria: three articles were randomized controlled studies and ten were cohort studies. Pooled results showed a significant effect on laboratory-confirmed influenza incidence but not ILI. While the overall incidence of absenteeism was not changed by vaccine, ILI absenteeism was significantly reduced. The duration of absenteeism was also shortened by vaccination. All published economic evaluations consistently found that the immunization of HCW was cost saving based on crude estimates of avoided absenteeism by vaccination. No studies, however, comprehensively evaluated both health outcomes and costs of vaccination programs to examine cost-effectiveness.

Discussion: Our findings reinforced the influenza vaccine effects in reducing infection incidence and length of absenteeism. A better understanding of the incidence of absenteeism and comprehensive economic program evaluations are required to ensure the best possible management of ill HCWs and the investment in HCW immunization in increasingly constrained financial environments. These steps are fundamental to establish sustainability and cost-effectiveness of vaccination programs and underpin HCW immunization policy.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Absenteeism
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Health Personnel / economics
  • Health Personnel / statistics & numerical data*
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / economics
  • Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / prevention & control
  • Infectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-Professional / statistics & numerical data
  • Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient / economics
  • Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient / prevention & control
  • Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient / statistics & numerical data
  • Influenza Vaccines / therapeutic use*
  • Influenza, Human / economics
  • Influenza, Human / epidemiology
  • Influenza, Human / prevention & control*
  • Influenza, Human / transmission
  • Seasons
  • Vaccination / economics
  • Vaccination / statistics & numerical data*

Substances

  • Influenza Vaccines

Grant support

The authors acknowledge research grant funding from the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council for Centre of Research Excellence Grant GNT1030103 (https://www.nhmrc.gov.au) and the Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation for Stimulus Grant SG0020-000643 (http://www.aushsi.org.au). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.