Purpose of review: Chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) and mupirocin are increasingly used for Staphylococcus aureus decolonization to prevent healthcare-associated infections; however, increased use of these agents has led to concerns for growing resistance and reduced efficacy. In this review, we describe current understanding of reduced susceptibility to CHG and mupirocin in S. aureus and their potential clinical implications.
Recent findings: While emergence of S. aureus tolerant or resistant to topical antimicrobial agents used for decolonization is well described, the clinical impact of reduced susceptibility is not clear. Important challenges are that standardized methods of resistance testing and interpretation are not established, and the risk for selection for co- or cross-resistance using universal, as opposed to targeted decolonization, is unclear. Evidence continues to support S. aureus decolonization in certain patient groups, although further studies are needed to determine the long-term impact of CHG and mupirocin resistance on efficacy. Strategies to mitigate further development of reduced susceptibility and the consequences of selection pressures through universal decolonization on resistance will benefit from further investigation.
Keywords: Antimicrobial resistance; Antiseptic; Chlorhexidine; Decolonization; Mupirocin; Staphylococcus aureus.