Community-level changes in condom use and uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis by gay and bisexual men in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia: results of repeated behavioural surveillance in 2013-17
- PMID: 29885813
- DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30072-9
Community-level changes in condom use and uptake of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis by gay and bisexual men in Melbourne and Sydney, Australia: results of repeated behavioural surveillance in 2013-17
Erratum in
-
Corrections.Lancet HIV. 2018 Aug;5(8):e411. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30186-3. Lancet HIV. 2018. PMID: 30102155 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) has been rapidly rolled out in large, publicly funded implementation projects in Victoria and New South Wales, Australia. Using behavioural surveillance of gay and bisexual men, we analysed the uptake and effect of PrEP, particularly on condom use by gay and bisexual men not using PrEP.
Methods: We collected data from the Melbourne and Sydney Gay Community Periodic Surveys (GCPS), cross-sectional surveys of adult gay and bisexual men in Melbourne, VIC, and Sydney, NSW. Recruitment occurred at gay venues or events and online. Eligible participants were 18 years or older (face-to-face recruitment) or 16 years or older (online recruitment), identified as male (including transgender participants who identified as male); and having had sex with a man in the past 5 years or identified as gay or bisexual, or both. Using multivariate logistic regression, we assessed trends in condom use, condomless anal intercourse with casual partners (CAIC), and PrEP use by gay and bisexual men, controlling for sample variation over time.
Findings: Between Jan 1, 2013, and March 31, 2017, 27 011 participants completed questionnaires in the Melbourne (n=13 051) and Sydney (n=13 960) GCPS. 16 827 reported sex with casual male partners in the 6 months before survey and were included in these analyses. In 2013, 26 (1%) of 2692 men reported CAIC and were HIV-negative and using PrEP, compared with 167 (5%) of 3660 men in 2016 and 652 (16%) of 4018 men in 2017 (p<0·0001). Consistent condom use was reported by 1360 (46%) of 2692 men in 2013, 1523 (42%) of 3660 men in 2016, and 1229 (31%) of 4018 men in 2017 (p<0·0001). In 2013, 800 (30%) of 2692 men who were HIV-negative or untested and not on PrEP reported CAIC, compared with 1118 (31%) of 3660 men in 2016, and 1166 (29%) of 4018 in 2017 (non-significant trend).
Interpretation: A rapid increase in PrEP use by gay and bisexual men in Melbourne and Sydney was accompanied by an equally rapid decrease in consistent condom use. Other jurisdictions should consider the potential for community-level increases in CAIC when modelling the introduction of PrEP and in monitoring its effect.
Funding: Australian Government Department of Health, Victorian Department of Health and Human Services, and New South Wales Ministry of Health.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Time to focus more on condomless anal sex in non-PrEP users.Lancet HIV. 2018 Aug;5(8):e410-e411. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30100-0. Epub 2018 Jun 6. Lancet HIV. 2018. PMID: 29885814 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comfort Relying on HIV Pre-exposure Prophylaxis and Treatment as Prevention for Condomless Sex: Results of an Online Survey of Australian Gay and Bisexual Men.AIDS Behav. 2018 Nov;22(11):3617-3626. doi: 10.1007/s10461-018-2097-2. AIDS Behav. 2018. PMID: 29564695
-
Willingness to use and have sex with men taking HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP): results of online surveys of Australian gay and bisexual men, 2011-2015.Sex Transm Infect. 2017 Sep;93(6):438-444. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2016-052774. Epub 2017 Jan 20. Sex Transm Infect. 2017. PMID: 28108701
-
Variations in HIV Prevention Coverage in Subpopulations of Australian Gay and Bisexual Men, 2017-2021: Implications for Reducing Inequities in the Combination Prevention Era.AIDS Behav. 2024 May;28(5):1469-1484. doi: 10.1007/s10461-023-04172-3. Epub 2023 Sep 27. AIDS Behav. 2024. PMID: 37755522 Free PMC article.
-
Dealing with pre-exposure prophylaxis-associated condom migration: changing the paradigm for men who have sex with men.Sex Health. 2017 Feb;14(1):106-110. doi: 10.1071/SH16128. Sex Health. 2017. PMID: 27585107 Review.
-
Does pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention in men who have sex with men change risk behaviour? A systematic review.J Clin Nurs. 2018 Sep;27(17-18):3254-3265. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13990. J Clin Nurs. 2018. PMID: 28771856 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis for HIV: Bioethical, Clinical, and Epidemiological Considerations.Linacre Q. 2024 Nov;91(4):386-402. doi: 10.1177/00243639241239068. Epub 2024 Mar 21. Linacre Q. 2024. PMID: 39493495
-
Oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis use and resistance-associated mutations among men who have sex with men and transgender persons newly diagnosed with HIV in the Netherlands: results from the ATHENA cohort, 2018 to 2022.Euro Surveill. 2024 Sep;29(38):2400083. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2024.29.38.2400083. Euro Surveill. 2024. PMID: 39301743 Free PMC article.
-
Syphilis testing, incidence, and reinfection among gay and bisexual men in Australia over a decade spanning HIV PrEP implementation: an analysis of surveillance data from 2012 to 2022.Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024 Aug 24;51:101175. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2024.101175. eCollection 2024 Oct. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2024. PMID: 39263009 Free PMC article.
-
Addressing Sexually Transmitted Infections Due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the Present and Future.Microorganisms. 2024 Apr 28;12(5):884. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12050884. Microorganisms. 2024. PMID: 38792714 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sexual Pleasure and Healthcare Settings: Focusing on Pleasure to Improve Healthcare Delivery and Utilization.Int J Sex Health. 2021 Sep 21;33(4):572-586. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2021.1955802. eCollection 2021. Int J Sex Health. 2021. PMID: 38595777 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
