Listening to Patients' Voices: Workarounds Patients Use to Construct Pain Intensity Ratings
- PMID: 29890886
- DOI: 10.1177/1049732318773714
Listening to Patients' Voices: Workarounds Patients Use to Construct Pain Intensity Ratings
Abstract
This study analyzed patients' perspectives about a measure of current, usual, and extreme pain and a measure of activity-related pain. Thirty-one patients with osteoarthritis participated in focus groups. Researchers completed thematic analysis of transcripts using coding software and an inductive approach. Three emerging themes were that many factors affected patients' perceptions and ratings of pain intensity, patients used different approaches to construct pain ratings, and patients interpreted maximal response anchors differently. Particularly, novel findings were that patients evaluated pain fluctuation, location, duration, and quality when constructing pain intensity ratings. Also, activity items helped patients to remember pain and provided a valued context for communicating pain experiences. However, the activities needed to be sufficiently described and personally relevant. These findings further clarify the challenges patients face and the workarounds they use when rating pain intensity. The patients' suggestions for improved administration methods and items warrant future investigation.
Keywords: United States; activities of daily living; assessment; qualitative.
Similar articles
-
Patients' impression of change following treatment for chronic pain: global, specific, a single dimension, or many?J Pain. 2015 Jun;16(6):518-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.02.007. Epub 2015 Mar 4. J Pain. 2015. PMID: 25746196
-
Barriers to Chronic Pain Measurement: A Qualitative Study of Patient Perspectives.Pain Med. 2015 Jul;16(7):1256-64. doi: 10.1111/pme.12717. Epub 2015 Feb 17. Pain Med. 2015. PMID: 25688752 Free PMC article.
-
Measuring participation in patients with chronic back pain-the 5-Item Pain Disability Index.Spine J. 2018 Feb;18(2):307-313. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.172. Epub 2017 Jul 20. Spine J. 2018. PMID: 28735767
-
Patient reported outcome measures of pain intensity: Do they tell us what we need to know?Scand J Pain. 2016 Apr;11:73-76. doi: 10.1016/j.sjpain.2015.12.004. Epub 2016 Jan 9. Scand J Pain. 2016. PMID: 28850473
-
A content analysis of activity pacing in chronic pain: what are we measuring and why?Clin J Pain. 2014 Jul;30(7):639-45. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000024. Clin J Pain. 2014. PMID: 24042344 Review.
Cited by
-
Supporting parent capacity to manage pain in young children with cancer at home: Co-design and usability testing of the PainCaRe app.Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2023 Feb 9;6(3):80-88. doi: 10.1002/pne2.12097. eCollection 2024 Sep. Paediatr Neonatal Pain. 2023. PMID: 39473834 Free PMC article.
-
Patients' strategies for numeric pain assessment: a qualitative interview study of individuals with hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome.Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Apr;46(8):1527-1533. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2200039. Epub 2023 Apr 17. Disabil Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 37067184
-
The Limitations of User-and Human-Centered Design in an eHealth Context and How to Move Beyond Them.J Med Internet Res. 2022 Oct 5;24(10):e37341. doi: 10.2196/37341. J Med Internet Res. 2022. PMID: 36197718 Free PMC article.
-
Communicating and understanding pain: Limitations of pain scales for patients with sickle cell disorder and other painful conditions.J Health Psychol. 2022 Jan;27(1):103-118. doi: 10.1177/1359105320944987. Epub 2020 Aug 1. J Health Psychol. 2022. PMID: 32744117 Free PMC article.
-
What narrative devices do people with systemic sclerosis use to describe the experience of pain from digital ulcers: a multicentre focus group study at UK scleroderma centres.BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 11;10(6):e037568. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037568. BMJ Open. 2020. PMID: 32532783 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
