Community-based HPV self-collection versus visual inspection with acetic acid in Uganda: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the ASPIRE trial

BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 12;8(6):e020484. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020484.

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is the leading cause of cancer death for women in Uganda, despite the potential for prevention through organised screening. Community-based self-collected human papillomavirus (HPV) testing has been proposed to reduce barriers to screening.

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of the Advances in Screening and Prevention of Reproductive Cancers (ASPIRE) trial, conducted in Kisenyi, Uganda in April 2014 (n=500). The trial compared screening uptake and compliance with follow-up in two arms: (1) community-based (ie, home or workplace) self-collected HPV testing (facilitated by community health workers) with clinic-based visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) triage of HPV-positive women ('HPV-VIA') and (2) clinic-based VIA ('VIA'). In both arms, VIA was performed at the local health unit by midwives with VIA-positive women receiving immediate treatment with cryotherapy.

Design: We informed a Monte Carlo simulation model of HPV infection and cervical cancer with screening uptake, compliance and retrospective cost data from the ASPIRE trial; additional cost, test performance and treatment effectiveness data were drawn from observational studies. The model was used to assess the cost-effectiveness of each arm of ASPIRE, as well as an HPV screen-and-treat strategy ('HPV-ST') involving community-based self-collected HPV testing followed by treatment for all HPV-positive women at the clinic.

Outcome measures: The primary outcomes were reductions in cervical cancer risk and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), expressed in dollars per year of life saved (YLS).

Results: HPV-ST was the most effective and cost-effective screening strategy, reducing the lifetime absolute risk of cervical cancer from 4.2% (range: 3.8%-4.7%) to 3.5% (range: 3.2%-4%), 2.8% (range: 2.4%-3.1%) and 2.4% (range: 2.1%-2.7%) with ICERs of US$130 (US$110-US$150) per YLS, US$240 (US$210-US$280) per YLS, and US$470 (US$410-US$550) per YLS when performed one, three and five times per lifetime, respectively. Findings were robust across sensitivity analyses, unless HPV costs were more than quadrupled.

Conclusions: Community-based self-collected HPV testing followed by treatment for HPV-positive women has the potential to be an effective and cost-effective screening strategy.

Keywords: Uganda; cervical cancer; cost-effectiveness; screening; self-collected HPV testing.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Colposcopy / economics
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Cryosurgery
  • Early Detection of Cancer / economics
  • Early Detection of Cancer / methods*
  • Female
  • Human Papillomavirus DNA Tests / economics*
  • Humans
  • Mass Screening / economics
  • Middle Aged
  • Monte Carlo Method
  • Physical Examination
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Specimen Handling / methods*
  • Uganda
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Uterine Cervical Neoplasms / surgery

Grants and funding