Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 5;12:227.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00227. eCollection 2018.

Brain Responses to Dynamic Facial Expressions: A Normative Meta-Analysis

Free PMC article

Brain Responses to Dynamic Facial Expressions: A Normative Meta-Analysis

Oksana Zinchenko et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .
Free PMC article


Identifying facial expressions is crucial for social interactions. Functional neuroimaging studies show that a set of brain areas, such as the fusiform gyrus and amygdala, become active when viewing emotional facial expressions. The majority of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies investigating face perception typically employ static images of faces. However, studies that use dynamic facial expressions (e.g., videos) are accumulating and suggest that a dynamic presentation may be more sensitive and ecologically valid for investigating faces. By using quantitative fMRI meta-analysis the present study examined concordance of brain regions associated with viewing dynamic facial expressions. We analyzed data from 216 participants that participated in 14 studies, which reported coordinates for 28 experiments. Our analysis revealed bilateral fusiform and middle temporal gyri, left amygdala, left declive of the cerebellum and the right inferior frontal gyrus. These regions are discussed in terms of their relation to models of face processing.

Keywords: activation likelihood estimate; dynamic faces; fMRI meta-analysis; facial expressions; social cognition.


Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA flowchart for eligibility of articles (Template by Moher et al., 2009).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Rendered ALE map showing significant concordance across studies for dynamic facial expressions. A, anterior; P, Posterior; L, left; R, right. All coordinates are listed in Table 2.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 6 articles

See all "Cited by" articles


    1. Adolphs R. (2010). What does the amygdala contribute to social cognition? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1191, 42–61. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05445.x - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R., Baron-Cohen S., Tranel D. (2002). Impaired recognition of social emotions following amygdala damage. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 14, 1264–1274. 10.1162/089892902760807258 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adolphs R., Spezio M. (2006). Role of the amygdala in processing visual social stimuli. Prog. Brain Res. 156, 363–378. 10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56020-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Allison T., Puce A., McCarthy G. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 267–278. 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01501-1 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aron A. R., Bullmore E. T., Sahakian B. J., Robbins T. W. (2003). Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 115–117. 10.1038/nn1003 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources