Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec;52(23):1498-1506.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098539. Epub 2018 Jun 23.

Treatment After Traumatic Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review With a Network Meta-Analysis

Free PMC article

Treatment After Traumatic Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review With a Network Meta-Analysis

Lauri Kavaja et al. Br J Sports Med. .
Free PMC article


Objective: To review and compare treatments (1) after primary traumatic shoulder dislocation aimed at minimising the risk of chronic shoulder instability and (2) for chronic post-traumatic shoulder instability.

Design: Intervention systematic review with random effects network meta-analysis and direct comparison meta-analyses.

Data sources: Electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, DARE, HTA, NHSEED, Web of Science) and reference lists were searched from inception to 15 January 2018.

Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Randomised trials comparing any interventions either after a first-time, traumatic shoulder dislocation or chronic post-traumatic shoulder instability, with a shoulder instability, function or quality of life outcome.

Results: Twenty-two randomised controlled trials were included. There was moderate quality evidence suggesting that labrum repair reduced the risk of future shoulder dislocation (relative risk 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.8, p=0.026), and that with non-surgical management 47% of patients did not experience shoulder redislocation. Very low to low-quality evidence suggested no benefit of immobilisation in external rotation versus internal rotation. There was low-quality evidence that an open procedure was superior to arthroscopic surgery for preventing shoulder redislocations.

Conclusions: There was moderate-quality evidence that half of the patients managed with physiotherapy after a first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation did not experience recurrent shoulder dislocations. If chronic instability develops, surgery could be considered. There was no evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgical management for post-traumatic chronic shoulder instability.

Keywords: meta-analysis; shoulder.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.


Figure 1
Figure 1
Study accrual flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative risk (RR) of a redislocation after treatment of a first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation at (A) 1 year and at (B) 2 years derived from the network meta-analysis.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 2 articles


    1. Yang NP, Chen HC, Phan DV, et al. Epidemiological survey of orthopedic joint dislocations based on nationwide insurance data in Taiwan, 2000-2005. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011;12:253 10.1186/1471-2474-12-253 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fabbriciani C, Milano G, Demontis A, et al. Arthroscopic versus open treatment of Bankart lesion of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 2004;20:456–62. 10.1016/j.arthro.2004.03.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jakobsen BW, Johannsen HV, Suder P, et al. Primary repair versus conservative treatment of first-time traumatic anterior dislocation of the shoulder: a randomized study with 10-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2007;23:118–23. 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.11.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kirkley A, Griffin S, Richards C, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of immediate arthroscopic stabilization versus immobilization and rehabilitation in first traumatic anterior dislocations of the shoulder. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery 1999;15:507–14. 10.1053/ar.1999.v15.015050 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Archetti Netto N, Tamaoki MJ, Lenza M, et al. Treatment of Bankart lesions in traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: a randomized controlled trial comparing arthroscopy and open techniques. Arthroscopy 2012;28:900–8. 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.032 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms