Presenting Symptoms Independently Predict Mortality in Septic Shock: Importance of a Previously Unmeasured Confounder
- PMID: 29965833
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003260
Presenting Symptoms Independently Predict Mortality in Septic Shock: Importance of a Previously Unmeasured Confounder
Abstract
Objectives: Presenting symptoms in patients with sepsis may influence rapidity of diagnosis, time-to-antibiotics, and outcome. We tested the hypothesis that vague presenting symptoms are associated with delayed antibiotics and increased mortality. We further characterized individual presenting symptoms and their association with mortality.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: Emergency department of large, urban, academic U.S. hospital.
Patients: All adult patients with septic shock treated in the emergency department between April 2014 and March 2016.
Interventions: None.
Measurements and main results: Of 654 septic shock cases, 245 (37%) presented with vague symptoms. Time-to-antibiotics from first hypotension or elevated lactate was significantly longer for those with vague symptoms versus those with explicit symptoms of infection (1.6 vs 0.8 hr; p < 0.01), and in-hospital mortality was also substantially higher (34% vs 16%; p < 0.01). Patients with vague symptoms were older and sicker as evidenced by triage hypotension, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, initial serum lactate, and need for intubation. In multivariate analysis, vague symptoms were independently associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 2.12; 95% CI, 1.32-3.40; p < 0.01), whereas time-to-antibiotics was not associated with mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.94-1.08; p = 0.78). Of individual symptoms, only the absence of fever, chills, or rigors (odds ratio, 2.70; 95% CI, 1.63-4.47; p < 0.01) and presence of shortness of breath (odds ratio, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.23-3.15; p < 0.01) were independently associated with mortality.
Conclusions: More than one third of patients with septic shock presented to the emergency department with vague symptoms that were not specific to infection. These patients had delayed antibiotic administration and higher risk of mortality even after controlling for demographics, illness acuity, and time-to-antibiotics in multivariate analysis. These findings suggest that the nature of presenting symptoms is an important component of sepsis clinical phenotyping and may be an important confounder in sepsis epidemiologic studies.
Comment in
-
The Changing Paradigm of Sepsis: Early Diagnosis, Early Antibiotics, Early Pressors, and Early Adjuvant Treatment.Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct;46(10):1690-1692. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003310. Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 30216303 No abstract available.
-
Timing of Antibiotic Administration and Mortality in Septic Patients Presenting With Vague Symptoms.Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):e1222. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003382. Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 30444820 No abstract available.
-
The authors reply.Crit Care Med. 2018 Dec;46(12):e1222-e1223. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003481. Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 30444821 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The DISPARITY-II study: delays to antibiotic administration in women with severe sepsis or septic shock.Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Dec;21(12):1499-502. doi: 10.1111/acem.12546. Epub 2014 Nov 25. Acad Emerg Med. 2014. PMID: 25424151
-
Predictors of patients who present to the emergency department with sepsis and progress to septic shock between 4 and 48 hours of emergency department arrival.Crit Care Med. 2015 May;43(5):983-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000861. Crit Care Med. 2015. PMID: 25668750
-
Delayed Second Dose Antibiotics for Patients Admitted From the Emergency Department With Sepsis: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes.Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):956-965. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002377. Crit Care Med. 2017. PMID: 28328652
-
The Impact of Timing of Antibiotics on Outcomes in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1907-15. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001142. Crit Care Med. 2015. PMID: 26121073 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sepsis and Septic Shock - Basics of diagnosis, pathophysiology and clinical decision making.Med Clin North Am. 2020 Jul;104(4):573-585. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2020.02.011. Epub 2020 May 12. Med Clin North Am. 2020. PMID: 32505253 Review.
Cited by
-
SEPSIGN: early identification of sepsis signs in emergency department.Intern Emerg Med. 2024 Oct 30. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03802-5. Online ahead of print. Intern Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 39477836
-
State of the art of sepsis care for the emergency medicine clinician.J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024 Aug 12;5(4):e13264. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13264. eCollection 2024 Aug. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2024. PMID: 39139749 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Infection on Frail Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: Insights From the PalMuSIC Study.Cureus. 2024 Jul 5;16(7):e63897. doi: 10.7759/cureus.63897. eCollection 2024 Jul. Cureus. 2024. PMID: 39099977 Free PMC article.
-
Early versus delayed enteral nutrition in ICU patients with sepsis: a propensity score-matched analysis based on the MIMIC-IV database.Front Nutr. 2024 Jun 24;11:1370472. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1370472. eCollection 2024. Front Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38978696 Free PMC article.
-
Ten misconceptions regarding decision-making in critical care.World J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 9;13(2):89644. doi: 10.5492/wjccm.v13.i2.89644. eCollection 2024 Jun 9. World J Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38855268 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
