Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 19;373(1753):20170232.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0232.

Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour

Affiliations

Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour

Noa Pinter-Wollman et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Built structures, such as animal nests or buildings that humans occupy, serve two overarching purposes: shelter and a space where individuals interact. The former has dominated much of the discussion in the literature. But, as the study of collective behaviour expands, it is time to elucidate the role of the built environment in shaping collective outcomes. Collective behaviour in social animals emerges from interactions, and collective cognition in humans emerges from communication and coordination. These collective actions have vast economic implications in human societies and critical fitness consequences in animal systems. Despite the obvious influence of space on interactions, because spatial proximity is necessary for an interaction to occur, spatial constraints are rarely considered in studies of collective behaviour or collective cognition. An interdisciplinary exchange between behavioural ecologists, evolutionary biologists, cognitive scientists, social scientists, architects and engineers can facilitate a productive exchange of ideas, methods and theory that could lead us to uncover unifying principles and novel research approaches and questions in studies of animal and human collective behaviour. This article, along with those in this theme issue aims to formalize and catalyse this interdisciplinary exchange.This article is part of the theme issue 'Interdisciplinary approaches for uncovering the impacts of architecture on collective behaviour'.

Keywords: architecture; collective behaviour; nest; network science; space syntax; team cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Pinter-Wollman N. 2015. Nest architecture shapes the collective behaviour of harvester ants. Biol. Lett. 11, 20150695 (10.1098/rsbl.2015.0695) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kabo FW, Cotton-Nessler N, Hwang YH, Levenstein MC, Owen-Smith J. 2014. Proximity effects on the dynamics and outcomes of scientific collaborations. Res. Pol. 43, 1469–1485. (10.1016/j.respol.2014.04.007) - DOI
    1. Birnholtz JP, Gutwin C, Hawkey K. 2007. Privacy in the open: how attention mediates awareness and privacy in open-plan offices In Group'07: Proc. of the 2007 Int. Acm Conf. on Supporting Group Work, Sanibel Island, FL, USA, 4–7 November 2007, pp. 51–60. New York, NY: ACM.
    1. Vischer JC. 2008. Towards an environmental psychology of workspace: how people are affected by environments for work. Archit. Sci. Rev. 51, 97–108. (10.3763/asre.2008.5114) - DOI
    1. Fiore SM. 2008. Interdisciplinarity as teamwork—how the science of teams can inform team science. Small Gr. Res. 39, 251–277. (10.1177/1046496408317797) - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources