Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 10;2(3):115-123.
doi: 10.1515/jccm-2016-0018. eCollection 2016 Jul.

The Diagnosis and Hemodynamic Monitoring of Circulatory Shock: Current and Future Trends

Affiliations

The Diagnosis and Hemodynamic Monitoring of Circulatory Shock: Current and Future Trends

Adham Hendy et al. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). .

Abstract

Circulatory shock is a complex clinical syndrome encompassing a group of conditions that can arise from different etiologies and presented by several different hemodynamic patterns. If not corrected, cell dysfunction, irreversible multiple organ insufficiency, and death may occur. The four basic types of shock, hypovolemic, cardiogenic, obstructive and distributive, have features similar to that of hemodynamic shock. It is therefore essential, when monitoring hemodynamic shock, to making accurate clinical assessments which will guide and dictate appropriate management therapy. The European Society of Intensive Care has recently made recommendations for monitoring hemodynamic shock. The present paper discusses the issues raised in the new statements, including individualization of blood pressure targets, prediction of fluid responsiveness, and the use of echocardiography as the first means during the initial evaluation of circulatory shock. Also, the place of more invasive hemodynamic monitoring techniques and future trends in hemodynamic and metabolic monitoring in circulatory shock, will be debated.

Keywords: circulatory shock; future trends; hemodynamic shock; new statements; transesophageal echocardiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: Nothing to declare.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The three main cross-sectional views with ImaCor – hemodynamic transesophageal echocardiography (h-TEE) probe. LV: left ventricle, RA right atrium, LA: left atrium, RV: right ventricle, RPA: right pulmonary artery, SVC: superior vena cava, Ao: aorta (ascending aorta)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ. et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management. Intensive Care Med. 2007(33):575–90. - PubMed
    1. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M. et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014(40):1795–815. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL, Rhodes A, Perel A. et al. Clinical review: Update on hemodynamic monitoring - a consensus of 16. Crit Care. 2011;15:229. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vincent JL, Pelosi P, Pearse R. et al. Perioperative cardiovascular monitoring of high-risk patients: a consensus of 12. Crit Care. 2015;19:224. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Herget-Rosenthal S, Saner F, Chawla L S.. Approach to hemodynamic shock and vasopressors. J Am SocNephrol. 2008(3):546–53. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources