Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock
- PMID: 29971592
- PMCID: PMC7095388
- DOI: 10.1007/s00134-018-5175-z
Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock
Abstract
Objective: To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome and underlying causes of sepsis and septic shock.
Design: A consensus committee of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Society of Critical Care Medicine was convened at the annual meetings of both societies. Subgroups had teleconference and electronic-based discussion. The entire committee iteratively developed the entire document and recommendations.
Methods: Each committee member independently gave their top five priorities for sepsis research. A total of 88 suggestions (ESM 1 - supplemental table 1) were grouped into categories by the committee co-chairs, leading to the formation of seven subgroups: infection, fluids and vasoactive agents, adjunctive therapy, administration/epidemiology, scoring/identification, post-intensive care unit, and basic/translational science. Each subgroup had teleconferences to go over each priority followed by formal voting within each subgroup. The entire committee also voted on top priorities across all subgroups except for basic/translational science.
Results: The Surviving Sepsis Research Committee provides 26 priorities for sepsis and septic shock. Of these, the top six clinical priorities were identified and include the following questions: (1) can targeted/personalized/precision medicine approaches determine which therapies will work for which patients at which times?; (2) what are ideal endpoints for volume resuscitation and how should volume resuscitation be titrated?; (3) should rapid diagnostic tests be implemented in clinical practice?; (4) should empiric antibiotic combination therapy be used in sepsis or septic shock?; (5) what are the predictors of sepsis long-term morbidity and mortality?; and (6) what information identifies organ dysfunction?
Conclusions: While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines give multiple recommendations on the treatment of sepsis, significant knowledge gaps remain, both in bedside issues directly applicable to clinicians, as well as understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the development and progression of sepsis. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.
Keywords: Priorities; Research; Sepsis; Septic shock; Surviving Sepsis Campaign.
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. DeBacker is immediate past president of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and has received consulting fees from Edwards Lifesciences, Fresenius Kabi, and Grifols. Dr. Deutschman is a consultant for Enlivix Therapeutix LTD. Dr. Ferrer Roca received honoraria from Toray, MSD, Pfizer and Grifols. Dr. Martin serves on a medical advisory board for Edwards Lifesciences and Grifols. Dr. Antonelli is president of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and received honoraria from Pfizer, Toray, Orion, and Air liquid. Dr. Evans is the current co-chair of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines committee. Dr. Kesecioglu is president-elect of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and has received honorarium from Xenios AG. Professor Rhodes is the current co-chair of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines committee.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Research Priorities for Sepsis and Septic Shock.Crit Care Med. 2018 Aug;46(8):1334-1356. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003225. Crit Care Med. 2018. PMID: 29957716
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008.Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;36(1):296-327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41. Crit Care Med. 2008. PMID: 18158437
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Feb;21(2):e52-e106. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002198. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020. PMID: 32032273
-
Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities 2023.Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 1;52(2):268-296. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006135. Epub 2024 Jan 19. Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38240508
-
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012.Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;41(2):580-637. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af. Crit Care Med. 2013. PMID: 23353941
Cited by
-
Research Progress on the Mechanism and Management of Septic Cardiomyopathy: A Comprehensive Review.Emerg Med Int. 2023 Nov 20;2023:8107336. doi: 10.1155/2023/8107336. eCollection 2023. Emerg Med Int. 2023. PMID: 38029224 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL DERIVED FROM ANALYSIS OF TIME-COURSE GENE-EXPRESSION DATASETS REVEALS TEMPORALLY STABLE GENE MARKERS PREDICTIVE OF SEPSIS MORTALITY.Shock. 2023 Nov 1;60(5):671-677. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000002226. Epub 2023 Sep 23. Shock. 2023. PMID: 37752077 Free PMC article.
-
Identification of Clinically Significant Cytokine Signature Clusters in Patients With Septic Shock.Crit Care Med. 2023 Dec 1;51(12):e253-e263. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006032. Epub 2023 Sep 5. Crit Care Med. 2023. PMID: 37678209
-
Evaluation of the Novel Sepsis Biomarker Host-Derived Delta-like Canonical Notch Ligand 1-A Secondary Analysis of 405 Patients Suffering from Inflammatory or Infectious Diseases.Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 23;24(11):9164. doi: 10.3390/ijms24119164. Int J Mol Sci. 2023. PMID: 37298115 Free PMC article.
-
A model of porcine polymicrobial septic shock.Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023 Jun 2;11(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40635-023-00513-7. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2023. PMID: 37264259 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) JAMA. 2016;315:801–810. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME, Rochwerg B, Rubenfeld GD, Angus DC, Annane D, Beale RJ, Bellinghan GJ, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith C, De Backer DP, French CJ, Fujishima S, Gerlach H, Hidalgo JL, Hollenberg SM, Jones AE, Karnad DR, Kleinpell RM, Koh Y, Lisboa TC, Machado FR, Marini JJ, Marshall JC, Mazuski JE, McIntyre LA, McLean AS, Mehta S, Moreno RP, Myburgh J, Navalesi P, Nishida O, Osborn TM, Perner A, Plunkett CM, Ranieri M, Schorr CA, Seckel MA, Seymour CW, Shieh L, Shukri KA, Simpson SQ, Singer M, Thompson BT, Townsend SR, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Wiersinga WJ, Zimmerman JL, Dellinger RP. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:486–552. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Levy MM, Rhodes A, Phillips GS, Townsend SR, Schorr CA, Beale R, Osborn T, Lemeshow S, Chiche JD, Artigas A, Dellinger RP. Surviving sepsis campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study. Crit Care Med. 2015;43:3–12. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000723. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Levy MM, Dellinger RP, Townsend SR, Linde-Zwirble WT, Marshall JC, Bion J, Schorr C, Artigas A, Ramsay G, Beale R, Parker MM, Gerlach H, Reinhart K, Silva E, Harvey M, Regan S, Angus DC. The surviving sepsis campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:367–374. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cb0cdc. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
