Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 5:362:k2638.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2638.

Periconception glycaemic control in women with type 1 diabetes and risk of major birth defects: population based cohort study in Sweden

Affiliations

Periconception glycaemic control in women with type 1 diabetes and risk of major birth defects: population based cohort study in Sweden

Jonas F Ludvigsson et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine the association between maternal type 1 diabetes and the risk of major birth defects according to levels of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) within three months before or after estimated conception.

Design: Population based historical cohort study using nationwide health registers.

Setting: Sweden, 2003-15.

Participants: 2458 singleton liveborn infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes and a glycated haemoglobin measurement within three months before or after estimated conception and 1 159 865 infants of mothers without diabetes.

Main outcome measures: Major cardiac and non-cardiac birth defects according to glycated haemoglobin levels.

Results: 122 cases of major cardiac defects were observed among 2458 infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes. Compared with 15 cases of major cardiac defects per 1000 infants of mothers without diabetes, the rates among infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes were 33 per 1000 for a glycated haemoglobin level of <6.5% (adjusted risk ratio 2.17, 95% confidence interval 1.37 to 3.42), 49 per 1000 for 6.5% to <7.8% (3.17, 2.45 to 4.11), 44 per 1000 for 7.8% to <9.1% (2.79, 1.90 to 4.12), and 101 per 1000 for ≥9.1% (6.23, 4.32 to 9.00). The corresponding adjusted risk differences were 17 (5 to 36), 32 (21 to 46), 26 (13 to 46), and 77 (49 to 118) cases of major cardiac defects per 1000 infants, respectively. 50 cases of major non-cardiac defects were observed among infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes. Compared with 18 cases of major non-cardiac defects per 1000 infants of mothers without diabetes, the rates among infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes were 22 per 1000 for a glycated haemoglobin level of <6.5% (adjusted risk ratio 1.18, 0.68 to 2.07), 19 per 1000 for 6.5% to <7.8% (1.01, 0.66 to 1.54), 17 per 1000 for 7.8% to <9.1% (0.89, 0.46 to 1.69), and 32 per 1000 for ≥9.1% (1.68, 0.85 to 3.33).

Conclusion: Among liveborn infants of mothers with type 1 diabetes, increasingly worse glycaemic control in the three months before or after estimated conception was associated with a progressively increased risk of major cardiac defects. Even with glycated haemoglobin within target levels recommended by guidelines (<6.5%), the risk of major cardiac defects was increased more than twofold. The risk of major non-cardiac defects was not statistically significantly increased at any of the four glycated haemoglobin levels examined; the study had limited statistical power for this outcome and was based on live births only.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; however, BP has received an unrestricted research grant from the Novo Nordisk Foundation for a diabetes project not related to the present work. MN has received grants from Pfizer and Astra Zeneca for rheumatology projects unrelated to the present work and serves on the scientific advisory board for Itrim (compensation <$5000 per year). None of the other authors have any conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Flow of participant inclusion in study cohort
Fig 2
Fig 2
Predicted unadjusted risk of major birth defects associated with type 1 diabetes according to maternal levels of glycated haemoglobin within three months before or after estimated conception
Fig 3
Fig 3
Association between maternal type 1 diabetes and risk of major birth defects, using alternative measures of poor glycaemic control and diabetes severity. *Adjusted for calendar year, maternal age, country of birth, living with partner, education, parity, body mass index, smoking status, and other autoimmune diseases. The reference category in all analyses was infants born to mothers without diabetes (see table 2 for number of infants, number of events, and number of events per 1000 infants). Long term glycaemic control was defined as the mean of the last three measurements for glycated haemoglobin. The risk ratio plot uses a log scale

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Weinstock RS, Xing D, Maahs DM, et al. T1D Exchange Clinic Network Severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis in adults with type 1 diabetes: results from the T1D Exchange clinic registry. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013;98:3411-9. 10.1210/jc.2013-1589. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rawshani A, Rawshani A, Franzén S, et al. Mortality and Cardiovascular Disease in Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1407-18. 10.1056/NEJMoa1608664. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lind M, Svensson AM, Kosiborod M, et al. Glycemic control and excess mortality in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1972-82. 10.1056/NEJMoa1408214. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inkster ME, Fahey TP, Donnan PT, Leese GP, Mires GJ, Murphy DJ. Poor glycated haemoglobin control and adverse pregnancy outcomes in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review of observational studies. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2006;6:30. 10.1186/1471-2393-6-30. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao E, Zhang Y, Zeng X, Liu B. Association between maternal diabetes mellitus and the risk of congenital malformations: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Drug Discov Ther 2015;9:274-81. 10.5582/ddt.2015.01044. - DOI - PubMed