Cancer-associated thrombosis in patients with implanted ports: a prospective multicenter French cohort study (ONCOCIP)
- PMID: 29980524
- DOI: 10.1182/blood-2018-03-837153
Cancer-associated thrombosis in patients with implanted ports: a prospective multicenter French cohort study (ONCOCIP)
Abstract
The need to accurately identify cancer outpatients at high risk of thrombotic complications is still unmet. In a prospective, multicenter cohort study (ONCOlogie et Chambres ImPlantables [ONCOCIP]), consecutive adult patients with a solid tumor and implanted port underwent 12-month follow-up. Our primary objective was to identify risk factors for (1) catheter-related thrombosis, defined as ipsilateral symptomatic upper-limb deep-vein thrombosis with or without pulmonary embolism, and (2) venous thromboembolism other than catheter-related, defined as any symptomatic superficial- or deep-vein thrombosis (other than catheter-related) or pulmonary embolism, and incidental pulmonary embolism. All events were objectively confirmed and centrally adjudicated. Rate assessments integrated competing risk of death. Overall, 3032 patients were included (median age: 63 years; women: 58%). The most frequent cancer locations were breast (33.7%), lung (18.5%), and colorectal (15.6%), cancer being metastatic in 43.2% of patients. Most patients (97.1%) received chemotherapy. By 12 months, 48 (1.6%) patients had been lost to follow-up and 656 (24.6%) had died; 3.8% (n = 111) of patients had experienced catheter-related thrombosis, and 9.6% (n = 276) venous thromboembolism other than catheter-related. By multivariate analysis, use of cephalic vein for catheter insertion predicted catheter-related thrombosis, whereas ongoing antiplatelet therapy was protective; risk factors for venous thromboembolism other than catheter-related were advanced age, previous venous thromboembolism, cancer site, and low hemoglobin level or increased leukocyte count before chemotherapy. In conclusion, this large prospective cohort study showed a high rate of venous thromboembolism in patients with a solid tumor and implanted port. Risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis differed from those for venous thromboembolism not catheter-related. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02025894.
© 2018 by The American Society of Hematology.
Similar articles
-
Clinical course of isolated distal deep vein thrombosis in patients with active cancer: a multicenter cohort study.J Thromb Haemost. 2017 Sep;15(9):1757-1763. doi: 10.1111/jth.13761. Epub 2017 Jul 18. J Thromb Haemost. 2017. PMID: 28639418
-
Long-term rivaroxaban for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism in patients with active cancer in a prospective multicenter trial.Korean J Intern Med. 2019 Sep;34(5):1125-1135. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2018.097. Epub 2018 May 23. Korean J Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 29788694 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Three-month mortality rate and clinical predictors in patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer. Findings from the RIETE registry.Thromb Res. 2013 Jan;131(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 8. Thromb Res. 2013. PMID: 23141849
-
Venous thromboembolism: epidemiology and magnitude of the problem.Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2012 Sep;25(3):235-42. doi: 10.1016/j.beha.2012.06.007. Epub 2012 Aug 9. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol. 2012. PMID: 22959540 Review.
-
Effect of testing for cancer on cancer- and venous thromboembolism (VTE)-related mortality and morbidity in people with unprovoked VTE.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 23;8(8):CD010837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010837.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 08;11:CD010837. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010837.pub4 PMID: 28832905 Free PMC article. Updated. Review.
Cited by
-
Predictive model for totally implanted venous access ports‑related long‑term complications in patients with lung cancer.Oncol Lett. 2024 May 15;28(1):326. doi: 10.3892/ol.2024.14459. eCollection 2024 Jul. Oncol Lett. 2024. PMID: 38807672 Free PMC article.
-
Central venous access device terminologies, complications, and reason for removal in oncology: a scoping review.BMC Cancer. 2024 Apr 19;24(1):498. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12099-8. BMC Cancer. 2024. PMID: 38641574 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Primary Thromboprophylaxis for the Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Cancer Patients with Central Venous Catheters: A Literature Review.J Clin Med. 2024 Mar 14;13(6):1660. doi: 10.3390/jcm13061660. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38541886 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comprehensive Review of Risk Factors and Thrombophilia Evaluation in Venous Thromboembolism.J Clin Med. 2024 Jan 9;13(2):362. doi: 10.3390/jcm13020362. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38256496 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: Trends in Clinical Features, Treatment, and Outcomes From 2001 to 2020.JACC CardioOncol. 2023 Nov 15;5(6):758-772. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.09.003. eCollection 2023 Dec. JACC CardioOncol. 2023. PMID: 38205016 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical

