Why Are the Majority of Active Compounds in the CNS Domain Natural Products? A Critical Analysis

J Med Chem. 2018 Dec 13;61(23):10345-10374. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b01922. Epub 2018 Jul 20.

Abstract

Small-molecule natural products (NPs) have a long and successful track record of providing first-in-class drugs and pharmacophore (scaffolds) in all therapeutic areas, serving as a bridge between modern and traditional medicine. This trajectory has been remarkably successful in three key areas of modern therapeutics: cancers, infections, and CNS diseases. Beginning with the discovery of morphine 200 years ago, natural products have remained the primary source of new drugs/scaffolds for CNS diseases. In this perspective, we address the question: why are the majority of active compounds in the CNS domain natural products? Our analysis indicates that ∼84% approved drugs for CNS diseases are NPs or NP-inspired, and interestingly, 20 natural products provided more than 400 clinically approved CNS drugs. We have discussed unique physicochemical properties of NPs and NP-inspired vis-à-vis synthetic drugs, isoform selectivity, and evolutionary relationship, providing a rationale for increasing focus on natural product driven discovery for next-generation drugs for neurodegenerative diseases.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biological Products / pharmacology*
  • Central Nervous System Agents / pharmacology*
  • Drug Discovery*
  • Humans
  • Molecular Targeted Therapy

Substances

  • Biological Products
  • Central Nervous System Agents