Myocardial Scar and Mortality in Severe Aortic Stenosis
- PMID: 30002099
- PMCID: PMC6221382
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032839
Myocardial Scar and Mortality in Severe Aortic Stenosis
Abstract
Background: Aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis is timed primarily on the development of symptoms, but late surgery can result in irreversible myocardial dysfunction and additional risk. The aim of this study was to determine whether the presence of focal myocardial scar preoperatively was associated with long-term mortality.
Methods: In a longitudinal observational outcome study, survival analysis was performed in patients with severe aortic stenosis listed for valve intervention at 6 UK cardiothoracic centers. Patients underwent preprocedural echocardiography (for valve severity assessment) and cardiovascular magnetic resonance for ventricular volumes, function and scar quantification between January 2003 and May 2015. Myocardial scar was categorized into 3 patterns (none, infarct, or noninfarct patterns) and quantified with the full width at half-maximum method as percentage of the left ventricle. All-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality were tracked for a minimum of 2 years.
Results: Six hundred seventy-four patients with severe aortic stenosis (age, 75±14 years; 63% male; aortic valve area, 0.38±0.14 cm2/m2; mean gradient, 46±18 mm Hg; left ventricular ejection fraction, 61.0±16.7%) were included. Scar was present in 51% (18% infarct pattern, 33% noninfarct). Management was surgical AVR (n=399) or transcatheter AVR (n=275). During follow-up (median, 3.6 years), 145 patients (21.5%) died (52 after surgical AVR, 93 after transcatheter AVR). In multivariable analysis, the factors independently associated with all-cause mortality were age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% CI, 1.11-2.04; P=0.009, scaled by epochs of 10 years), Society of Thoracic Surgeons score (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.22; P=0.007), and scar presence (HR, 2.39; 95% CI, 1.40-4.05; P=0.001). Scar independently predicted all-cause (26.4% versus 12.9%; P<0.001) and cardiovascular (15.0% versus 4.8%; P<0.001) mortality, regardless of intervention (transcatheter AVR, P=0.002; surgical AVR, P=0.026 [all-cause mortality]). Every 1% increase in left ventricular myocardial scar burden was associated with 11% higher all-cause mortality hazard (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.05-1.17; P<0.001) and 8% higher cardiovascular mortality hazard (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17; P<0.001).
Conclusions: In patients with severe aortic stenosis, late gadolinium enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance was independently associated with mortality; its presence was associated with a 2-fold higher late mortality.
Keywords: aortic valve stenosis; magnetic resonance imaging; mortality; myocardium.
Figures
Comment in
-
Not Too Little and Not Too Late.Circulation. 2018 Oct 30;138(18):1948-1950. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036600. Circulation. 2018. PMID: 30372139 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Association of Myocardial Fibrosis and Stroke Volume by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis With Outcome After Valve Replacement: The British Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance AS700 Study.JAMA Cardiol. 2022 May 1;7(5):513-520. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2022.0340. JAMA Cardiol. 2022. PMID: 35385057 Free PMC article.
-
Prognostic significance of LGE by CMR in aortic stenosis patients undergoing valve replacement.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15;64(2):144-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.02.612. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 25011718
-
Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis: Incorporation of left ventricular systolic function and stroke volume index.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Jun;149(6):1558-66.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.03.008. Epub 2015 Mar 11. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015. PMID: 25869085
-
Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement for Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis: A Single Technology Assessment of Perceval Sutureless Aortic Valve [Internet].Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2017 Aug 25. Report from the Norwegian Institute of Public Health No. 2017-01. PMID: 29553663 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Assessment of Aortic Stenosis by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Quantification of Flow, Characterization of Myocardial Injury, Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Planning, and More.Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2019 Aug;27(3):427-437. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2019.04.004. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2019. PMID: 31279447 Review.
Cited by
-
Quantification of Replacement Fibrosis in Aortic Stenosis: A Narrative Review on the Utility of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 31;14(21):2435. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14212435. Diagnostics (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39518402 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Early Intervention in Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis and Myocardial Fibrosis: The EVOLVED Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA. 2024 Oct 28:e2422730. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.22730. Online ahead of print. JAMA. 2024. PMID: 39466640
-
Moderate Aortic Stenosis-Advanced Imaging, Risk Assessment, and Treatment Strategies.Struct Heart. 2024 Feb 1;8(5):100279. doi: 10.1016/j.shj.2023.100279. eCollection 2024 Sep. Struct Heart. 2024. PMID: 39290682 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance for Structural Aortic Valve Stenosis Procedures.J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 1;13(17):5184. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175184. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39274397 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Chronic Aortic Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Dec 25;24(12):359. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2412359. eCollection 2023 Dec. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023. PMID: 39077090 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Nkomo VT, Gardin JM, Skelton TN, Gottdiener JS, Scott CG, Enriquez-Sarano M. Burden of valvular heart diseases: a population-based study. Lancet. 2006;368:1005–1011. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69208-8. - PubMed
-
- Dweck MR, Boon NA, Newby DE. Calcific aortic stenosis: a disease of the valve and the myocardium. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:1854–1863. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.093. - PubMed
-
- Carabello BA, Paulus WJ. Aortic stenosis. Lancet. 2009;373:956–966. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60211-7. - PubMed
-
- Baumgartner H, Falk V, Bax JJ, De Bonis M, Hamm C, Holm PJ, Iung B, Lancellotti P, Lansac E, Rodriguez Muñoz D, Rosenhek R, Sjögren J, Tornos Mas P, Vahanian A, Walther T, Wendler O, Windecker S, Zamorano JL ESC Scientific Document Group. 2017 ESC/EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2739–2791. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx391. - PubMed
-
- Weidemann F, Herrmann S, Störk S, Niemann M, Frantz S, Lange V, Beer M, Gattenlöhner S, Voelker W, Ertl G, Strotmann JM. Impact of myocardial fibrosis in patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Circulation. 2009;120:577–584. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.847772. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
