Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Oct;46(10):1585-1591.
doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003261.

Compliance With the National SEP-1 Quality Measure and Association With Sepsis Outcomes: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Chanu Rhee  1   2 , Michael R Filbin  3 , Anthony F Massaro  2 , Amy L Bulger  4 , Donna McEachern  4 , Kathleen A Tobin  5 , Barrett T Kitch  6 , Bert Thurlo-Walsh  7 , Aran Kadar  8 , Alexandra Koffman  9 , Anupam Pande  10 , Yasir Hamad  10 , David K Warren  10 , Travis M Jones  11 , Cara O'Brien  12 , Deverick J Anderson  11 , Rui Wang  1 , Michael Klompas  1   2 ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Prevention Epicenters Program
Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Compliance With the National SEP-1 Quality Measure and Association With Sepsis Outcomes: A Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study

Chanu Rhee et al. Crit Care Med. 2018 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: Many septic patients receive care that fails the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' SEP-1 measure, but it is unclear whether this reflects meaningful lapses in care, differences in clinical characteristics, or excessive rigidity of the "all-or-nothing" measure. We compared outcomes in cases that passed versus failed SEP-1 during the first 2 years after the measure was implemented.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Seven U.S. hospitals.

Patients: Adult patients included in SEP-1 reporting between October 2015 and September 2017.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Of 851 sepsis cases in the cohort, 281 (33%) passed SEP-1 and 570 (67%) failed. SEP-1 failures had higher rates of septic shock (20% vs 9%; p < 0.001), hospital-onset sepsis (11% vs 4%; p = 0.001), and vague presenting symptoms (46% vs 30%; p < 0.001). The most common reasons for failure were omission of 3- and 6-hour lactate measurements (228/570 failures, 40%). Only 86 of 570 failures (15.1%) had greater than 3-hour delays until broad-spectrum antibiotics. Cases that failed SEP-1 had higher in-hospital mortality rates (18.4% vs 11.0%; odds ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.19-2.80; p = 0.006), but this association was no longer significant after adjusting for differences in clinical characteristics and severity of illness (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.85-2.18; p = 0.205). Delays of greater than 3 hours until antibiotics were significantly associated with death (adjusted odds ratio, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.04-3.62; p = 0.038), whereas failing SEP-1 for any other reason was not (adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.70-1.72; p = 0.674).

Conclusions: Crude mortality rates were higher in sepsis cases that failed versus passed SEP-1, but there was no difference after adjusting for clinical characteristics and severity of illness. Delays in antibiotic administration were associated with higher mortality but only accounted for a small fraction of SEP-1 failures. SEP-1 may not clearly differentiate between high- and low-quality care, and detailed risk adjustment is necessary to properly interpret associations between SEP-1 compliance and mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Potential conflicts of interest: None of the authors have any conflicts to disclose.

Copyright form disclosure: The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for study cohort derivation and exclusions
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. QualityNet. Inpatient Hospitals Specifications Manual. https://www.qualitynet.org.
    1. The Clinician Perspective on Sepsis Care: Early Management Bundle for Severe Sepsis/Septic Shock. 2016 Nov 16; http://www.qualityreportingcenter.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/IQR_Pre....
    1. Klompas M, Rhee C. The CMS Sepsis Mandate: Right Disease, Wrong Measure. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(7):517–518. - PubMed
    1. Aaronson EL, Filbin MR, Brown DF, et al. New Mandated Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Requirements for Sepsis Reporting: Caution from the Field. J Emerg Med. 2017;52(1):109–116. - PubMed
    1. Venkatesh AK, Slesinger T, Whittle J, et al. Preliminary Performance on the New CMS Sepsis-1 National Quality Measure: Early Insights From the Emergency Quality Network (E-QUAL) Ann Emerg Med. 2018;71(1):10–15 e11. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances