Engagement or dismissiveness? Intersecting international theory and global health

Glob Public Health. 2019 Apr;14(4):503-514. doi: 10.1080/17441692.2018.1500621. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

Abstract

International relations theorists and global health politics scholars largely fail to communicate with one another. We argue that drawing on insights from classic and contemporary international theory more explicitly will positively augment the study of global health politics. This paper highlights four major theoretical orientations in the international relations literature (realism, neoliberal institutionalism, constructivism, and feminism) and discusses how an understanding of these perspectives can strengthen our understanding of global health policy.

Keywords: Realism; constructivism; feminism; international relations theory; neoliberal institutionalism.

MeSH terms

  • Feminism
  • Global Health*
  • Health Policy*
  • Internationality*
  • Models, Theoretical*
  • Politics