[Analysis of the Patient Factors in the Difference between Adverse Effect Evaluation and Distress Evaluation in Cancer Patients Receiving Chemotherapy]

Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2018 Jun;45(6):955-960.
[Article in Japanese]

Abstract

A safety evaluation of chemotherapy is performed by CTCAE. It is the evaluation by health care workers, and distress evaluation by patient himself is not included in it. Therefore, a health care worker underestimates patients' distress. This study was carried out to identify the patients' characteristics underlying differences between safety evaluation and distress evaluation. The patients who met the criteria were 72 in number. They were divided into 2 groups. Group A(17 patients)included patients who demonstrated difference between safety evaluation and distress evaluation. Group B(55 patients)included patient who did not show difference between safety evaluation and distress evaluation. The patients who visited a hospital were evaluated for QOL, depression screening, CTCAE(safety evaluation), and PRO-CTCAE(distress evaluation). A meaningful difference was observed between depression screening, QOL-ACD(physical status, psychological status, face scale, and total), and the number of items of side effect by PRO-CTCAE through a univariate analysis. A meaningful difference was observed for QOL-ACD(physical)in logistic regression analysis(odds ratio=1.47, p=0.013). It is suggested that having physical distress reflected by the QOL evaluation before chemotherapy results in the difference between safety evaluation and distress evaluation.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Agents / adverse effects*
  • Antineoplastic Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasms / drug therapy*
  • Quality of Life
  • Stress, Physiological
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Substances

  • Antineoplastic Agents