Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 13 (7), e0200300
eCollection

Is Genetic Fatherhood Within Reach for All Azoospermic Klinefelter Men?

Affiliations

Is Genetic Fatherhood Within Reach for All Azoospermic Klinefelter Men?

Veerle Vloeberghs et al. PLoS One.

Abstract

Background: Multidisciplinary management of Klinefelter cases is now considered good clinical practice in order to ensure optimal quality of life. Reproductive performance of Klinefelter men is an important issue however literature in this domain is limited and prone to bias.

Study design: This was a retrospective longitudinal cohort study performed at a tertiary referral University Centre for Reproductive Medicine and Genetics. One hundred thirty-eight non-mosaic azoospermic Klinefelter patients undergoing their first testicular biopsy (TESE) between 1994 and 2013, followed by intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) with fresh or frozen-thawed testicular sperm in the female partner, were followed-up longitudinally. The main outcome measure was cumulative live birth rate per Klinefelter patient embarking on TESE-ICSI.

Findings: In forty-eight men (48/138) sperm were successfully retrieved at the first TESE (34.8%). The mean age of the patients was 32.4 years. Younger age at first TESE was associated with a higher sperm retrieval rate (p<0.001). Overall 39 couples underwent 62 ICSI cycles and 13 frozen embryo transfer cycles resulting in in 20 pregnancies and 14 live birth deliveries (16 children). The mean age of the female partner was 28.1 years. The crude cumulative delivery rate after four ICSI cycles was 35.9%. Per intention-to-treat however, only 10.1% (14/138) of the Klinefelter men starting treatment succeeded in having their biologically own child(ren).

Conclusion: Non-mosaic Klinefelter patients with azoospermia seeking treatment by TESE-ICSI should be counseled that by intention-to-treat the chance of retrieving sperm is fair, however only a minority will eventually father genetically own children.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Schematic overview of the non-mosaic KS patients with azoospermia followed from first testicular sperm extraction until live birth delivery.
NOA, non-obstructive azoospermia; KS, Klinefelter Syndrome; TESE, testicular sperm extraction; pos, positive; neg, negative; ICSI; intracytoplasmic sperm injection; COC, cumulus oocyte complex; OR, oocyte retrieval; FRET, frozen embryo transfer.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Crude cumulative delivery rates in non-mosaic azoospermic KS patients.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Groth KA, Skakkebæk A, Høst C, Gravholt CH, Bojesen A. Clinical review: Klinefelter syndrome—a clinical update. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(1):20–30. 10.1210/jc.2012-2382 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Van Assche E, Bonduelle M, Tournaye H, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey et al. Cytogenetics of infertile men. Hum Reprod. 1996;11(S4):1–26. - PubMed
    1. Foresta C, Galeazzi C, Bettella A, Marin P, Rossato M, Garolla A et al. Analysis of Meiosis in Intratesticular Germ Cells from Subjects Affected by Classic Klinefelter’s Syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84(10):3807–10. 10.1210/jcem.84.10.6029 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bojesen A, Juul S, Gravholt CH. Prenatal and postnatal prevalence of Klinefelter Syndrome: a national registry study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(2):622–26. 10.1210/jc.2002-021491 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wikström AM, Dunkel L. Testicular Function in Klinefelter syndrome. Horm Res. 2008;69(6):317–26. 10.1159/000117387 - DOI - PubMed

Grant support

The authors received no specific funding for this study.
Feedback