Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Practice Guideline
. 2018 Jul 25:362:k2515.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2515.

Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation therapy alone for management of cryptogenic stroke? A clinical practice guideline

Affiliations
Practice Guideline

Patent foramen ovale closure, antiplatelet therapy or anticoagulation therapy alone for management of cryptogenic stroke? A clinical practice guideline

Ton Kuijpers et al. BMJ. .
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: All authors have completed the BMJ Rapid Recommendations interests disclosure form, and a detailed description of all disclosures is reported in appendix 2 on bmj.com. No authors had relevant financial interests. They declared the following intellectual interests: Elke Hoendermis is co-author of national recommendations on PFO closure and stroke on behalf of the working group of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology. Fred Spencer has published systematic review and meta-analysis on this topic. No panel member had any other intellectual conflict to disclose. As with all BMJ Rapid Recommendations, the executive team and The BMJ judged that no panel member had any financial conflict of interest. Professional and academic interests are minimised as much as possible, while maintaining necessary expertise on the panel to make fully informed decisions.

Figures

Fig 2
Fig 2
Characteristics of patients and trials included in systematic review of the effects of percutaneous closure followed by antiplatelet therapy versus antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy alone in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke. Evidence used from 6 randomised clinical trials (plus 2 further trials for comparison of antiplatelets and anticoagulants34 35)
Fig 3
Fig 3
Practical issues about use of percutaneous closure followed by antiplatelet therapy versus antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy alone in patients with patent foramen ovale (PFO) and cryptogenic stroke

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mir H, Siemieniuk R, Ge L., et al. Percutaneous closure plus antiplatelet therapy versus antiplatelet or anticoagulation therapy alone in patients with patent foramen ovale and cryptogenic stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis incorporating complementary external evidence. BMJ Open 2018;0:e023761 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023761. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mas JL, Derumeaux G, Guillon B, et al. CLOSE Investigators Patent foramen ovale closure or anticoagulation vs antiplatelets after stroke. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1011-21. 10.1056/NEJMoa1705915 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saver JL, Carroll JD, Thaler DE, et al. RESPECT Investigators Long-term outcomes of patent foramen ovale closure or medical therapy after stroke. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1022-32. 10.1056/NEJMoa1610057 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Søndergaard L, Kasner SE, Rhodes JF, et al. Gore REDUCE Clinical Study Investigators Patent foramen ovale closure or antiplatelet therapy for cryptogenic stroke. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1033-42. 10.1056/NEJMoa1707404 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Siemieniuk RA, Agoritsas T, Macdonald H, Guyatt GH, Brandt L, Vandvik PO. Introduction to BMJ Rapid Recommendations. BMJ 2016;354:i5191. 10.1136/bmj.i5191 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances