Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Jul 26;13(7):e0201187.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201187. eCollection 2018.

Prevention and Management of Unprofessional Behaviour Among Adults in the Workplace: A Scoping Review

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Prevention and Management of Unprofessional Behaviour Among Adults in the Workplace: A Scoping Review

Andrea C Tricco et al. PLoS One. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Unprofessional behaviour is a challenge in academic medicine. Given that faculty are role models for trainees, it is critical to identify strategies to manage these behaviours. A scoping review was conducted to identify interventions to prevent and manage unprofessional behaviour in any workplace or professional setting.

Methods: A search of 14 electronic databases was conducted in March 2016, reference lists of relevant systematic reviews were scanned, and grey literature was searched to identify relevant studies. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies that reported on interventions to prevent or manage unprofessional behaviours were included. Studies that reported impact on any outcome were eligible. Two reviewers independently screened articles and completed data abstraction. Qualitative analysis of the definitions of unprofessional behaviour was conducted. Data were charted to describe the study, participant, intervention and outcome characteristics.

Results: 12,482 citations were retrieved; 23 studies with 11,025 participants were included. The studies were 12 uncontrolled before and after studies, 6 controlled before and after studies, 2 cluster-randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 1 RCT, 1 non-randomised controlled trial and 1 quasi-RCT. Four constructs were identified in the definitions of unprofessional behaviour: verbal and/or non-verbal acts, repeated acts, power imbalance, and unwelcome behaviour. Interventions most commonly targeted individuals (22 studies, 95.7%) rather than organisations (4 studies, 17.4%). Most studies (21 studies, 91.3%) focused on increasing awareness. The most frequently targeted behaviour change was sexual harassment (4 of 7 studies).

Discussion: Several interventions appear promising in addressing unprofessional behaviour. Most of the studies included single component, in-person education sessions targeting individuals and increasing awareness of unprofessional behaviour. Fewer studies targeted the institutional culture or addressed behaviour change.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Study flow diagram.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

  • #MeToo and the medical profession.
    Holroyd-Leduc JM, Straus SE. Holroyd-Leduc JM, et al. CMAJ. 2018 Aug 20;190(33):E972-E973. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.181037. CMAJ. 2018. PMID: 30127036 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Bazelon E. Bullying in the Age of Trump The New York Times 2016. Available from: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/16/opinion/bullying-in-the-age-of-trump.html?_r=1.
    1. Boyle T. Ontario doctors ‘distressed’ over wave of bullying, infighting: The Toronto Star; 2017. Available from: https://www.thestar.com/life/health_wellness/2017/02/27/ontario-doctors-distressed-over-wave-of-bullying-infighting.html.
    1. Farley SS, C. Culture of cruelty: why bullying thrives in higher education 2014 [cited 2017]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/blog/2014/nov/03/why-bullying-thrives-higher-education.
    1. Fnais N, Soobiah C, Chen MH, Lillie E, Perrier L, Tashkhandi M, et al. Harassment and discrimination in medical training: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acad Med. 2014;89(5):817–27. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000200 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rouse LP, Gallagher-Garza S, Gebhard RE, Harrison SL, Wallace LS. Workplace bullying among family physicians: A gender focused study. J Womens Health. 2016;25(9):882–8. - PubMed

Publication types

Grant support

SES is funded by a Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Translation and the Mary Trimmer Chair in Geriatric Medicine (University of Toronto Department of Medicine); ACT is funded by a Tier 2 Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Synthesis. This project was funded by the Department of Medicine, University of Toronto to SES. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Feedback