Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jun 15;16(2):A126-A130.
eCollection 2018 Spring.

A Simple Method for Teaching Bayesian Hypothesis Testing in the Brain and Behavioral Sciences

Affiliations
Free PMC article

A Simple Method for Teaching Bayesian Hypothesis Testing in the Brain and Behavioral Sciences

Thomas J Faulkenberry. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Undergraduate statistics courses in the brain and behavioral sciences tend to be well-grounded in classical null hypothesis significance testing. However, many journals in the fields of neuroscience and psychology are turning away from these classical methods and their reliance on p-values in favor of alternative methods. One such alternative is Bayesian inference, and in particular, the Bayes factor, which indexes the extent to which observed data supports one hypothesis over another. As such, the Bayes factor provides an easy-to-interpret measure of evidence. However, this ease of interpretation is often in stark contrast with the actual ease of computation, even for simple experimental designs. In this paper, I present an easy-to-use formula for computing Bayes factors for two common hypothesis testing situations: the one-way ANOVA and the independent samples t-test. I give examples of its use and recommendations of how to report the results, which should help any teacher of statistics and research methods begin to incorporate Bayesian statistics into quantitative methods courses.

Keywords: Bayes factor; Bayesian methods; Hypothesis testing; Statistical inference; statistics education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bennett CM, Wolford GL, Miller MB. The principled control of false positives in neuroimaging. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2009;4:417–422. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsp053. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Berger JO, Delampady M. Testing precise hypotheses. Stat Sci. 1987;2:317–352. doi: 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705. - DOI
    1. Borota D, Murray E, Keceli G, Chang A, Watabe JM, Ly M, Toscano JP, Yassa MA. Post-study caffeine administration enhances memory consolidation in humans. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:201–203. doi: 10.1038/nn.3623. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Calin-Jageman RJ. After p values: the new statistics for undergraduate neuroscience education. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ. 2017;16:E1–E4. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cumming G, Calin-Jageman R. Introduction to the new statistics: estimation, open science, and beyond. New York, NY: Routledge; 2017.

LinkOut - more resources