Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep;25(9):403-411.
doi: 10.1002/jhbp.576. Epub 2018 Sep 6.

Validity of the Iwate Criteria for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Minimally Invasive Liver Resection

Affiliations

Validity of the Iwate Criteria for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Minimally Invasive Liver Resection

Felix Krenzien et al. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. .

Abstract

Background: Recently proposed by the International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resection, the Iwate criteria (IC) can be used by surgeons to predict the operative difficulty of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and were validated in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common indication for LLR.

Methods: The IC comprise six preoperative factors that allow the grading of operative difficulty as low, intermediate, advanced, or expert. IC scores were validated in patients with HCC who underwent LLR (n = 77).

Results: The median operative time was 212 min (range 57-461 min). The difficulty of the resections was categorized as low in 9% (n = 7), intermediate in 38% (n = 29), advanced in 36% (n = 28), and expert in 15% (n = 12) of the patients. IC score was significantly linked to operative time, length of stay and liver function (P < 0.05). The rates of postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo >II) for low, intermediate, advanced and expert were 0% (n = 0), 10% (n = 3), 3.5% (n = 1) and 50% (n = 6), respectively (P = 0.04).

Conclusion: The IC can be used to preoperatively assess difficulty of LLR and to predict postoperative complications in HCC patients. Thus, the IC score may be useful to differentiate easy procedures from difficult procedures and is ideal to build an LLR curriculum for upcoming surgeons.

Keywords: Carcinoma; Hepatectomy; Hepatocellular; Humans; Laparoscopy; Postoperative complications.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback