Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Filters applied. Clear all
, 204, 311-319

Neurocognitive Profiles in the Prodrome to Psychosis in NAPLS-1

Neurocognitive Profiles in the Prodrome to Psychosis in NAPLS-1

Eva Velthorst et al. Schizophr Res.

Abstract

Background: Most studies of neurocognitive functioning in Clinical High Risk (CHR) cohorts have examined group averages, likely concealing heterogeneous subgroups. We aimed to identify neurocognitive subgroups and to explore associated outcomes.

Methods: Data were acquired from 324 participants (mean age 18.4) in the first phase of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study (NAPLS-1), a multi-site consortium following individuals for up to 2 1/2 years. We applied Ward's method for hierarchical clustering data to 8 baseline neurocognitive measures, in 166 CHR individuals, 49 non-CHR youth with a family history of psychosis, and 109 healthy controls. We tested whether cluster membership was associated with conversion to psychosis, social and role functioning, and follow-up diagnosis. Analyses were repeated after data were clustered based on independently developed clinical decision rules.

Results: Four neurocognitive clusters were identified: Significantly Impaired (n = 33); Mildly Impaired (n = 82); Normal (n = 145) and High (n = 64). The Significantly Impaired subgroup demonstrated the largest deviations on processing speed and memory tasks and had a conversion rate of 58%, a 40% chance of developing a schizophrenia spectrum diagnosis (compared to 24.4% in the Mildly Impaired, and 10.3% in the other two groups combined), and significantly worse functioning at baseline and 12-months. Data clustered using clinical decision rules yielded similar results, pointing to high convergent validity.

Conclusion: Neurocognitive profiles vary substantially in their severity and are associated with diagnostic and functional outcome, underscoring neurocognition as a predictor of illness outcomes. These findings, if replicated, are a first step toward personalized treatment for individuals at-risk for psychosis.

Keywords: Clinical High Risk; Cluster analysis; Functional outcome; Heterogeneity; Neuropsychology.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that there are no conflicts of interest in relation to the subject of this study.The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health, the National Institutes of Health, or any other branch of the US Department of Health and Human Services.

Similar articles

References

    1. Aas M, Dazzan P, Mondelli V, Melle I, Murray RM, Pariante CM, 2014. A systematic review of cognitive function in first-episode psychosis, including a discussion on childhood trauma, stress, and inflammation. Front Psychiatry 4, 182. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Addington J, Cadenhead KS, Cannon TD, Cornblatt B, McGlashan TH, Perkins DO, Seidman LJ, Tsuang M, Walker EF, Woods SW, Heinssen R, North American Prodrome Longitudinal, S., 2007. North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study: a collaborative multisite approach to prodromal schizophrenia research. Schizophr Bull 33(3), 665–672. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agnew-Blais JC, Buka SL, Fitzmaurice GM, Smoller JW, Goldstein JM, Seidman LJ, 2015. Early Childhood IQ Trajectories in Individuals Later Developing Schizophrenia and Affective Psychoses in the New England Family Studies. Schizophr Bull 41(4), 817–823. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahmed AO, Strauss GP, Buchanan RW, Kirkpatrick B, Carpenter WT, 2018. Schizophrenia heterogeneity revisited: Clinical, cognitive, and psychosocial correlates of statistically-derived negative symptoms subgroups. J Psychiatr Res 97, 8–15. - PubMed
    1. Bechi M, Spangaro M, Agostoni G, Bosinelli F, Buonocore M, Bianchi L, Cocchi F, Guglielmino C, Bosia M, Cavallaro R, 2018. Intellectual and cognitive profiles in patients affected by schizophrenia. J Neuropsychol. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback