Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jul 23;8(3):e28.
doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2018.8.e28. eCollection 2018 Jul.

Cow's Milk Oral Immunotherapy in Real Life: 8-year Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Cow's Milk Oral Immunotherapy in Real Life: 8-year Long-Term Follow-Up Study

Inês Mota et al. Asia Pac Allergy. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has been recognized as a promising treatment for severe and long-lasting cow's milk (CM) allergy. Once maintenance has been achieved, patients should maintain daily intake of CM to ensure desensitization. Clinical experience concerning long-term follow-up is scarce.

Objective: The authors aimed to assess long-term efficacy and safety of a maintenance phase of OIT in real life.

Methods: Prospective study of all children and adolescents, who underwent CM-OIT and were subsequently followed at our allergy center on maintenance dose (200 mL daily) for at least 36 months after reaching the maintenance phase (from 2009 to 2016).

Results: Forty-two patients were enrolled: 60% male, 36% with history of anaphylaxis and 57% with asthma. The median time of follow-up was 69 months (range, 39-105 months) and the median age at the last clinical evaluation was 13 years (range, 6-23 years). Regarding adherence to the protocol: 92% are on free diet (at least 200 mL of CM daily; 7-g protein); 14% had transient interruptions and 7% definitely withdrawn with loss of tolerance. During maintenance, 45% developed mild to severe allergic reactions, and 7% had more than 3 episodes. A positive correlation between the occurrence of allergic reactions and history of anaphylaxis (p < 0.001) was found. The coexistence of asthma was risk factor for the occurrence of allergic reactions during maintenance.

Conclusion: This real-life study supports long-term efficacy and safety of CM-OIT. Despite daily intake, 41% had symptoms at some moment during the complete follow-up period; a total of 33 symptomatic days in patients with mean follow-up time of 67.5 months. Clinical tolerance depends on daily intake. The protective effect reached can be lost after CM withdrawal. History of anaphylaxis was a risk factor for the occurrence of allergic reactions during the maintenance phase.

Keywords: Anaphylaxis; Cow's milk allergy; Food allergy; Oral desensitization; Oral immunotherapy; Specific oral tolerance induction.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Characterization of the adverse reactions: symptom grading. GI, gastrointestinal.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Nwaru BI, Hickstein L, Panesar SS, Roberts G, Muraro A, Sheikh A, EAACI Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Guidelines Group Prevalence of common food allergies in Europe: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy. 2014;69:992–1007. - PubMed
    1. Skripak JM, Matsui EC, Mudd K, Wood RA. The natural history of IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007;120:1172–1177. - PubMed
    1. Yeung JP, Kloda LA, McDevitt J, Ben-Shoshan M, Alizadehfar R. Oral immunotherapy for milk allergy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;11:CD009542 - PubMed
    1. Martorell Calatayud C, Muriel García A, Martorell Aragonés A, De La Hoz Caballer B. Safety and efficacy profile and immunological changes associated with oral immunotherapy for IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2014;24:298–307. - PubMed
    1. Santos N, Gaspar A, Borrego LM, Morais-Almeida M. Successful oral tolerance induction to cow's milk in a child with allergy to extensively hydrolysed formula. Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) 2015;43:216–218. - PubMed
Feedback