Effectiveness and Safety of Rivaroxaban Compared to Acenocumarol after Infrainguinal Surgical Revascularization

Abstract

Background: Optimal antithrombotic therapy after lower limb infrainguinal revascularization remains a controversial topic. The use of anticoagulants, alone or in combination with antiplatelet drugs, can potentially improve patency rate and limb salvage, particularly in patients with risk factors for early thrombosis. Bleeding is the main complication of long-term anticoagulant use. New oral anticoagulants can represent an attractive alternative to the standard vitamin K antagonists. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness (bypass occlusion and major amputation) and safety (major bleeding and all-cause mortality) of rivaroxaban compared to acenocumarol after infrainguinal lower limb surgical revascularization.

Material and methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients with peripheral arterial disease submitted to lower limb infrainguinal bypass revascularization with vein or expanded polytetrafluoroethylene conduit, who were anticoagulated with acenocumarol or rivaroxaban after hospital discharge. Patients with proximal revascularization, revascularization due to any pathology other than peripheral arterial disease, coagulation disorder, stroke or acute myocardial infarction in less than 30 days, glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min, or on hemodialysis were excluded.

Results: One hundred nine patients were included (78.9% male), with a mean age of 64.8 years. After hospital discharge, 40 patients (36.7%) were medicated with rivaroxaban and 69 patients (63.3%) with acenocumarol. At 1 year of follow-up, patients under rivaroxaban and acenocumarol presented comparable major amputation rates (12.5 % vs. 10.1%, P = 0.756), bypass occlusion (22.5% vs. 24.6 %, P = 0.769), and mortality rate (10% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.756). Major bleeding occurred in 13.8% of patients. Patients with renal dysfunction had significantly higher bleeding risk with acenocumarol (45.5% vs. 0%, P = 0.028) compared to rivaroxaban, while patients with normal renal function presented similar bleeding rates with both anticoagulants (6.1% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.953).

Conclusions: Rivaroxaban has equivalent effectiveness to acenocumarol after infrainguinal bypass revascularization, with similar occlusion, major amputation, and mortality rates. Rivaroxaban has an improved safety profile in patients with moderate renal dysfunction due to a significantly lower incidence of major bleeding. In patients with normal renal function, rivaroxaban and acenocumarol present equivalent major bleeding rates.