Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 1;25(11):1507-1515.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocy103.

Assessing information sources to elucidate diagnostic process errors in radiologic imaging - a human factors framework

Laila Cochon  1 , Ronilda Lacson  1   2 , Aijia Wang  1 , Neena Kapoor  1   2 , Ivan K Ip  1   2 , Sonali Desai  2   3 , Allen Kachalia  2   3 , Jack Dennerlein  4 , James Benneyan  5 , Ramin Khorasani  1   2
Affiliations

Assessing information sources to elucidate diagnostic process errors in radiologic imaging - a human factors framework

Laila Cochon et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess information sources that may elucidate errors related to radiologic diagnostic imaging, quantify the incidence of potential safety events from each source, and quantify the number of steps involved from diagnostic imaging chain and socio-technical factors.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, Institutional Review Board-approved study was conducted at the ambulatory healthcare facilities associated with a large academic hospital. Five information sources were evaluated: an electronic safety reporting system (ESRS), alert notification for critical result (ANCR) system, picture archive and communication system (PACS)-based quality assurance (QA) tool, imaging peer-review system, and an imaging computerized physician order entry (CPOE) and scheduling system. Data from these sources (January-December 2015 for ESRS, ANCR, QA tool, and the peer-review system; January-October 2016 for the imaging ordering system) were collected to quantify the incidence of potential safety events. Reviewers classified events by the step(s) in the diagnostic process they could elucidate, and their socio-technical factors contributors per the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) framework.

Results: Potential safety events ranged from 0.5% to 62.1% of events collected from each source. Each of the information sources contributed to elucidating diagnostic process errors in various steps of the diagnostic imaging chain and contributing socio-technical factors, primarily Person, Tasks, and Tools and Technology.

Discussion: Various information sources can differentially inform understanding diagnostic process errors related to radiologic diagnostic imaging.

Conclusion: Information sources elucidate errors in various steps within the diagnostic imaging workflow and can provide insight into socio-technical factors that impact patient safety in the diagnostic process.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Diagnostic imaging chain workflow.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety model (adapted from SEIPS).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Event examples from various information sources and where they occur in the diagnostic imaging chain.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Institute of Medicine: To Err is Human Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US); 2000. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225182/. Accessed July 31, 2018.
    1. Committee on Patient Safety and Health Information Technology. Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
    1. Carayon P, Karsh BT, Gurses AP, et al. Macroergonomics in healthcare quality and patient safety. Rev Hum Factors Ergon 2013; 81: 4–54. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Al-Jumaili AA, Doucette WR.. Comprehensive literature review of factors influencing medication safety in nursing homes: using a systems model. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2017; 186: 470–88. - PubMed
    1. Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med 2006; 1457: 488–96. - PubMed

Publication types