Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Aug 20;8(1):12454.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-30085-6.

An Intermediate Incubation Period and Primitive Brooding in a Theropod Dinosaur

Affiliations
Free PMC article

An Intermediate Incubation Period and Primitive Brooding in a Theropod Dinosaur

David J Varricchio et al. Sci Rep. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Non-avian dinosaurs such as oviraptorosaurs and troodontids share several important reproductive characters with modern birds, including eggshell microstructure and iterative egg production. Nevertheless, debate exists concerning their incubation strategies. Here we estimate incubation period for the troodontid, Troodon formosus, by examining a near-term embryonic tooth. Synchrotron scanning and histologic thin sections allowed counting of daily (von Ebner) growth lines. The tooth preserves 31 intact lines with an average spacing of 3.3 ± 0.96 μm. Adding 8 more for the missing crown tip gives a total age of 39 days. Modern crocodilians begin to establish their functional dentition at approximately 47% through incubation. Thus, this tooth age suggests a Troodon incubation period of 74 days, falling midway between avian (44.4 days) and reptilian (107.3 days) values predicted by the Troodon egg mass (314 g). An accelerated incubation relative to modern reptiles supports brooding and concurs with a suite of features in oviraptorosaurs and troodontids (sequential laying, large complex clutches, and precocial young) that appear dependent upon both adult body and incubation temperatures elevated over ambient conditions. However, the largely buried condition of Troodon clutches may have prohibited efficient brooding, necessitating longer incubation than that of modern birds with fully exposed eggs.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(AC,E) Embryonic Troodon tooth of MOR 246-11 in lingual view (E), longitudinal section produced from synchrotron scanning (A), and cross sectioning from histologic thin sectioning (B). Carets and box in A mark, respectively, the approximate position of the cross section in B and enlarged section in C showing a close-up of daily growth lines. Scale bars = 100 µm in A and B, 5 µm in C, and 0.5 mm in E. (D) phylogeny showing hypothesized incubation methods among theropod dinosaurs with burial of clutches as the primitive condition among theropods and likely most dinosaurs; brooding of more derived and partially exposed clutches among maniraptoran dinosaurs such as oviraptorosaurs and troodontids and perhaps some enantiornithine birds of the Mesozoic, and finally eggs brooded completely free of sediment burial in Neornithes. Modified from Varricchio and Jackson with artwork by Danny Anduza.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Hirsch KF, Quinn B. Eggs and eggshell fragments from the Upper Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation of Montana. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 1990;10:491–511. doi: 10.1080/02724634.1990.10011832. - DOI
    1. Mikhailov, K. E. Fossil and recent eggshell in amniotic vertebrates: Fine structure, comparative morphology and classification. Spec. Pap. Palaeontol. 56 (1997).
    1. Zelenitsky DK, Modesto S, Currie PJ. Bird-like characteristics of troodontid theropod eggshell. Cret. Res. 2002;23:297–305. doi: 10.1006/cres.2002.1010. - DOI
    1. Grellet-Tinner, G. & Chiappe, L. M. Dinosaur eggs and nesting: Implications for understanding the origin of birds. In Feathered dragons: studies on the transition from dinosaurs to birds (eds Currie, P. J., Koppelhus, E. B., Shugar, M. A. & Wright, J. L.) 185–214, (Indiana University Press, 2004).
    1. Varricchio DJ, Jackson FD. A phylogenetic assessment of prismatic dinosaur eggs from the Cretaceous Two Medicine Formation of Montana. J. Vertebr. Paleontol. 2004;24:931–937. doi: 10.1671/0272-4634(2004)024[0931:APAOPD]2.0.CO;2. - DOI

Publication types

Feedback