Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2018 Oct 1;178(10):1390-1399.
doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3675.

Assessment of the Safety of Discharging Select Patients Directly Home From the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Population-Based Cohort Study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Assessment of the Safety of Discharging Select Patients Directly Home From the Intensive Care Unit: A Multicenter Population-Based Cohort Study

Henry T Stelfox et al. JAMA Intern Med. .

Abstract

Importance: The safety of discharging adult patients recovering from critical illness directly home from the intensive care unit (ICU) is unknown.

Objective: To compare the health care utilization and clinical outcomes for ICU patients discharged directly home from the ICU with those of patients discharged home via the hospital ward.

Design, setting, and participants: Retrospective population-based cohort study of adult patients admitted to the ICU of 9 medical-surgical hospitals from January 1, 2014, to January 1, 2016, with 1-year follow-up after hospital discharge. All adult ICU patients were discharged home alive from hospital, and the propensity score matched cohort (1:1) was based on patient characteristics, therapies received in the ICU, and hospital characteristics.

Exposures: Patient disposition on discharge from the ICU: directly home vs home via the hospital ward.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was readmission to the hospital within 30 days of hospital discharge. The secondary outcomes were emergency department visit within 30 days and death within 1 year.

Results: Among the 6732 patients included in the study, 2826 (42%) were female; median age, 56 years (interquartile range, 41-67 years); 922 (14%) were discharged directly home, with significant variation found between hospitals (range, 4.4%-44.0%). Compared with patients discharged home via the hospital ward, patients discharged directly home were younger (median age 47 vs 57 years; P < .001), more likely to be admitted with a diagnosis of overdose, substance withdrawal, seizures, or metabolic coma (32% [295] vs 10% [594]; P < .001), to have a lower severity of acute illness on ICU admission (median APACHE II score 15 vs 18; P < .001), and receive less than 48 hours of invasive mechanical ventilation (42% [389] vs 34% [1984]; P < .001). In the propensity score matched cohort (n = 1632), patients discharged directly home had similar length of ICU stay (median, 3.1 days vs 3.0 days; P = .42) but significantly shorter length of hospital stay (median, 3.3 days vs 9.2 days; P < .001) compared with patients discharged home via the hospital ward. There were no significant differences between patients discharged directly home or home via the hospital ward for readmission to the hospital (10% [n = 81] vs 11% [n = 92]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.64-1.20) or emergency department visit (25% [n = 200] vs 26% [n = 212]; HR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.81-1.09) within 30 days of hospital discharge. Four percent of patients in both groups died within 1 year of hospital discharge (n = 31 and n = 34 in the discharged directly home and discharged home via the hospital ward groups, respectively) (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.60-1.35).

Conclusions and relevance: The discharge of select adult patients directly home from the ICU is common, and it is not associated with increased health care utilization or increased mortality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Selection of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Study Cohorts
aReasons for exclusion do not sum to the total number of patients because some patients experienced more than 1 admission to ICU during the study period. bUnable to link to discharge abstract database, data missing, or patients were not discharged from the hospital by September 30, 2016. cIncludes emergency department and ambulatory care in another facility or within the same reporting facility, palliative care or hospice facility, addiction treatment center, and jails.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Study Outcomes for the Propensity Matched Cohort of Patients Discharged Directly Home From the ICU vs Discharged via a Hospital Ward
ED indicates emergency department; ICU, intensive care unit.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Stelfox HT, Lane D, Boyd JM, et al. . A scoping review of patient discharge from intensive care: opportunities and tools to improve care. Chest. 2015;147(2):317-327. doi:10.1378/chest.13-2965 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nates JL, Nunnally M, Kleinpell R, et al. . ICU admission, discharge, and triage guidelines: a framework to enhance clinical operations, development of institutional policies, and further research. Crit Care Med. 2016;44(8):1553-1602. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000001856 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Patient Safety Network Patient safety primers: handoffs and signouts. 2016. https://psnet.ahrq.gov/primers/primer/9. Accessed November 7, 2016.
    1. The Economist Accident and emergency. https://www.economist.com/britain/2016/09/10/accident-and-emergency. Accessed June 29, 2018.
    1. Lau VI, Priestap FA, Lam JNH, Ball IM. Factors associated with the increasing rates of discharges directly home from intensive care units—a Direct From ICU Sent Home Study. J Intensive Care Med. 2018;33(2):121-127. doi:10.1177/0885066616668483 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types