Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct;32(10):1179-1189.
doi: 10.1007/s10822-018-0150-x. Epub 2018 Aug 20.

Absolute and relative pKa predictions via a DFT approach applied to the SAMPL6 blind challenge

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Absolute and relative pKa predictions via a DFT approach applied to the SAMPL6 blind challenge

Qiao Zeng et al. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2018 Oct.
Free PMC article

Abstract

In this work, quantum mechanical methods were used to predict the microscopic and macroscopic pKa values for a set of 24 molecules as a part of the SAMPL6 blind challenge. The SMD solvation model was employed with M06-2X and different basis sets to evaluate three pKa calculation schemes (direct, vertical, and adiabatic). The adiabatic scheme is the most accurate approach (RMSE = 1.40 pKa units) and has high correlation (R2 = 0.93), with respect to experiment. This approach can be improved by applying a linear correction to yield an RMSE of 0.73 pKa units. Additionally, we consider including explicit solvent representation and multiple lower-energy conformations to improve the predictions for outliers. Adding three water molecules explicitly can reduce the error by 2-4 pKa units, with respect to experiment, whereas including multiple local minima conformations does not necessarily improve the pKa prediction.

Keywords: Implicit solvent; Quantum chemistry; SAMPL6; pK a.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Thermodynamic cycles used for pKa calculation schemes.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Structures of the 24 molecules in the SAMPL6 pKa challenge.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effect of microsolvation on pKa calculations schemes for SM01.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wang Y, Xing J, Xu Y, et al. (2015) In silico ADME/T modelling for rational drug design. Q Rev Biophys 48:488–515. doi: 10.1017/S0033583515000190 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zevatskii YE, Samoilov DV. (2011) Modern methods for estimation of ionization constants of organic compounds in solution. Russ J Org Chem 47:1445–1467. doi: 10.1134/S1070428011100010 - DOI
    1. Seybold PG, Shields GC (2015) Computational estimation of pK a values. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Mol Sci 5:290–297. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1218 - DOI
    1. Lee AC, Crippen GM (2009) Predicting pKa. J Chem Inf Model 49:2013–2033. doi: 10.1021/ci900209w - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fraczkiewicz R, Lobell M, Goller AH, et al. (2015) Best of both worlds: Combining pharma data and state of the art modeling technology to improve in silico p K a prediction. J Chem Inf Model 55:389–397. doi: 10.1021/ci500585w - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources