Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 30 (8), 1108-1111

Optimal Intensity of PNF Stretching: Maintaining the Efficacy of Stretching While Ensuring Its Safety


Optimal Intensity of PNF Stretching: Maintaining the Efficacy of Stretching While Ensuring Its Safety

Wootaek Lim. J Phys Ther Sci.


[Purpose] To investigate changes in hamstring flexibility in relation to intensity of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching and changes in pain over time, and examine the correlations between pain level and target intensity or flexibility gain. [Participants and Methods] Sixty-one healthy adults were randomly divided into 4 groups (100% [P100], 70% [P70], 40% [P40], and 10% [P10] of maximum voluntary isometric contraction) according to intensity of hold-relax stretching. Hamstring flexibility was measured with the active knee extension test, and pain was measured using the visual analogue scale. [Results] Concerning hamstring flexibility, P100 showed significant differences from P40 and P10, and P70 was significantly different from P10. At post-stretch, P100 significantly differed from P70, P40, and P10 in visual analogue scale. At 1 day, P100 significantly differed from P40 and P10. Although there was a significant correlation between post-stretch pain level and stretching intensity, there was no significant correlation between pain level and flexibility improvement. [Conclusion] Repetitive high-intensity stretching may cause heavy burden on muscle tissues, and pain caused by high-intensity stretching can hinder muscle performance. Moderate stretching intensity is recommended and considered conducive to maintaining the effects of stretching while ensuring its safety.

Keywords: Intensity; Pain; Stretching.


Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Correlation between individual target intensity and visual analogue scale (VAS) score. P100, P70, P40, and P10 are groups that performed stretching at 100%, 70%, 40%, and 10% of the maximum voluntary isometric contraction, respectively.

Similar articles

See all similar articles


    1. Feland JB, Marin HN: Effect of submaximal contraction intensity in contract-relax proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching. Br J Sports Med, 2004, 38: E18. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feland JB, Myrer JW, Merrill RM: Acute changes in hamstring flexibility: PNF versus static stretch in senior athletes. Phys Ther Sport, 2001, 2: 186–193.
    1. Khodayari B, Dehghani Y: The investigation of mid-term effect of different intensity of PNF stretching on improve hamstring flexibility, 4th World Conference on Educational Sciences (WCES-2012) 02–05 February 2012 Barcelona, Spain. Procedia Soc Behav Sci, 2012, 46: 5741–5744.
    1. Askling C, Lund H, Saartok T, et al. : Self-reported hamstring injuries in student-dancers. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2002, 12: 230–235. - PubMed
    1. Kim JW, Kwon OY, Kim MH: Differentially expressed genes and morphological changes during lengthened immobilization in rat soleus muscle. Differentiation, 2007, 75: 147–157. - PubMed