Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
- PMID: 30170075
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.08.1033
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis
Abstract
Background: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is now the standard of care for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis who are extreme, high, or intermediate risk for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
Objectives: The authors sought to evaluate TAVR in a prospective multicenter trial involving low-risk patients.
Methods: The Low Risk TAVR (Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic, Severe Aortic Stenosis) trial was the first U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved Investigational Device Exemption trial to enroll in the United States. This investigator-led trial was a prospective, multicenter, unblinded, comparison to historical controls from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) database. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 30 days.
Results: The authors enrolled 200 low-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis at 11 centers to undergo TAVR. The authors compared outcomes with an inverse probability weighting-adjusted control cohort of 719 patients who underwent SAVR at the same institutions using the STS database. At 30 days, there was zero all-cause mortality in the TAVR group versus 1.7% mortality in the SAVR group. There was zero in-hospital stroke rate in the TAVR group versus 0.6% stroke in the SAVR group. Permanent pacemaker implantation rates were similar between TAVR and SAVR (5.0% vs. 4.5%). The rates of new-onset atrial fibrillation (3.0%) and length of stay (2.0 ± 1.1 days) were low in the TAVR group. One patient (0.5%) in the TAVR group had >mild paravalvular leak at 30 days. Fourteen percent of TAVR patients had evidence of subclinical leaflet thrombosis at 30 days.
Conclusions: TAVR is safe in low-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, with low procedural complication rates, short hospital length of stay, zero mortality, and zero disabling stroke at 30 days. Subclinical leaflet thrombosis was observed in a minority of TAVR patients at 30 days. (Feasibility of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic, Severe Aortic Stenosis [Low Risk TAVR; NCT02628899).
Keywords: aortic stenosis; low risk; transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Is TAVR Ready for Prime Time in Low-Risk Patients?J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 30;72(18):2106-2108. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.09.004. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 30360819 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
TAVR in Low-Risk Patients: 1-Year Results From the LRT Trial.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 May 27;12(10):901-907. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 12. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019. PMID: 30860059 Clinical Trial.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients With Symptomatic Severe Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis.JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 May 11;13(9):1019-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Feb 24. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020. PMID: 32381181 Clinical Trial.
-
Feasibility of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in low-risk patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis: Rationale and design of the Low Risk TAVR (LRT) study.Am Heart J. 2017 Jul;189:103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 14. Am Heart J. 2017. PMID: 28625366 Clinical Trial.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Valve Replacement in Low-Intermediate Surgical Risk Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Invasive Cardiol. 2017 Jun;29(6):209-216. J Invasive Cardiol. 2017. PMID: 28570236 Review.
-
Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis.Am J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;117(2):252-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.034. Epub 2015 Nov 6. Am J Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 26639040 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of Decision Aid on Decision-making of Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Randomized Pilot Study.J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Apr 11;1(2):100025. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100025. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr. J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022. PMID: 39132569 Free PMC article.
-
Computational study of transcatheter aortic valve replacement based on patient-specific models-rapid surgical planning for self-expanding valves.Front Physiol. 2024 Jun 6;15:1407215. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1407215. eCollection 2024. Front Physiol. 2024. PMID: 38903911 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in the treatment of bicuspid aortic stenosis with "down-size" interventional valves: procedural and mid-term follow-up.J Thorac Dis. 2024 Jan 30;16(1):593-603. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1885. Epub 2024 Jan 22. J Thorac Dis. 2024. PMID: 38410558 Free PMC article.
-
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Two Decades of Evolution - TAVI From Current Perspective.Acta Inform Med. 2023;31(4):312-321. doi: 10.5455/aim.2023.31.312-321. Acta Inform Med. 2023. PMID: 38379687 Free PMC article.
-
Association of general anesthesia exposure with risk of postoperative delirium in patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis and systematic review.Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 27;13(1):16241. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43548-2. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37758810 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
