Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;9(1):99-104.
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1621705. Epub 2018 Feb 7.

Efficiency of Emergency Physicians: Insights from an Observational Study using EHR Log Files

Efficiency of Emergency Physicians: Insights from an Observational Study using EHR Log Files

Thomas G Kannampallil et al. Appl Clin Inform. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Objective: With federal mandates and incentives since the turn of this decade, electronic health records (EHR) have been widely adopted and used for clinical care. Over the last several years, we have seen both positive and negative perspectives on its use. Using an analysis of log files of EHR use, we investigated the nature of EHR use and their effect on an emergency department's (ED) throughput and efficiency.

Methods: EHR logs of time spent by attending physicians on EHR-based activities over a 6-week period (n = 2,304 patients) were collected. For each patient encounter, physician activities in the EHR were categorized into four activities: documentation, review, orders, and navigation. Four ED-based performance metrics were also captured: door-to-provider time, door-to-doctor time, door-to-disposition time, and length of stay (LOS). Association between the four EHR-based activities and corresponding ED performance metrics were evaluated.

Results: We found positive correlations between physician review of patient charts, and door-to-disposition time (r = 0.43, p < 0.05), and with LOS (r = 0.48, p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant associations between any of the other performance metrics and EHR activities.

Conclusion: The results highlight that longer time spent on reviewing information on the EHR is potentially associated with decreased ED throughput efficiency. Balancing these competing goals is often a challenge of physicians, and its implications for patient safety is discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Patient trajectory from arrival to the emergency department (ED) to discharge. The four ED performance metrics: door-to-provider, door-to-doctor, door-to-disposition, and length of stay are shown with respect to a patient's care trajectory through the ED. On the lower half, the time spent on each of the four electronic health record (EHR)-based activities during each of the performance metric measurement phases is shown: documentation (D), review (R), orders (O), and navigation (N). The time spent measures are not drawn to scale.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(15):1477–1479. - PubMed
    1. Dick R S, Steen E B. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 1991. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care.
    1. Häyrinen K, Saranto K, Nykänen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(05):291–304. - PubMed
    1. Patel V L, Kannampallil T G. Human factors and health information technology: current challenges and future directions. Yearb Med Inform. 2014;9(01):58–66. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patel V L, Kannampallil T G, Shortliffe E H. Role of cognition in generating and mitigating clinical errors. BMJ Qual Saf. 2015;24(07):468–474. - PubMed

Publication types