Quality-adjusted survival of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone among treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma: a quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis
- PMID: 30191365
- DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1984-3
Quality-adjusted survival of nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone among treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma: a quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) analysis
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the quality-adjusted survival of nivolumab plus ipilimumab combination and nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone among treatment-naive patients with advanced melanoma based on a minimum 36-month follow-up from the CheckMate 067 trial.
Methods: Overall survival was partitioned into time without symptoms of progression or toxicity (TWiST), time with treatment-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events after randomization but before progression (TOX), and time from progression until end of follow-up or death (REL). Mean quality-adjusted TWiST (Q-TWiST) was calculated by multiplying the mean time spent in each health state by a utility of 1.0 for TWiST and 0.5 for TOX and REL. Sensitivity analyses included varying utilities of TOX and REL; Q-TWiST gains at different follow-up times were calculated using EQ-5D-3L utilities from the trial. Relative Q-TWiST gain of ≥ 10% was considered clinically important.
Results: Compared with ipilimumab-treated patients, those who received nivolumab + ipilimumab combination had significantly longer TWiST and TOX but shorter REL; nivolumab-treated patients had significantly longer TWiST, shorter REL, and shorter but statistically nonsignificant TOX. Mean Q-TWiST was highest for nivolumab + ipilimumab (23.5 months; 95% CI 21.9-25.2), followed by nivolumab (21.8 months; 95% CI 20.2-23.4) and ipilimumab (15.3 months; 95% CI 13.9-16.6). Relative Q-TWiST gains were favorable and clinically important for nivolumab + ipilimumab combination (+ 36.81%) and nivolumab alone (+ 29.18%) versus ipilimumab alone. Relative gains increased with follow-up from 3 to 40 months for all comparisons. These gains remained consistent in magnitude and direction in the different sensitivity analyses.
Conclusions: Nivolumab + ipilimumab combination and nivolumab alone resulted in a statistically significant and clinically important improvement in quality-adjusted survival compared with ipilimumab alone.
Keywords: Advanced melanoma; Ipilimumab; Nivolumab; Q-TWiST; Quality-adjusted survival.
Similar articles
-
A Quality-adjusted Time Without Symptoms or Toxicity (Q-TWiST) Analysis of Nivolumab Versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC).Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019 Oct;17(5):356-365.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.05.010. Epub 2019 May 31. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31272883 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone versus ipilimumab alone in advanced melanoma (CheckMate 067): 4-year outcomes of a multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial.Lancet Oncol. 2018 Nov;19(11):1480-1492. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30700-9. Epub 2018 Oct 22. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30361170 Clinical Trial.
-
Quality-adjusted survival with combination nab-paclitaxel + gemcitabine vs gemcitabine alone in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a Q-TWiST analysis.J Med Econ. 2014 May;17(5):338-46. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2014.903122. Epub 2014 Mar 21. J Med Econ. 2014. PMID: 24654922
-
Risks and benefits of reinduction ipilimumab/nivolumab in melanoma patients previously treated with ipilimumab/nivolumab.J Immunother Cancer. 2021 Oct;9(10):e003395. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003395. J Immunother Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34702752 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nivolumab and ipilimumab: immunotherapy for treatment of malignant melanoma.Future Oncol. 2019 Feb;15(4):349-358. doi: 10.2217/fon-2018-0607. Epub 2018 Oct 18. Future Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30334646 Review.
Cited by
-
Treatment of Advanced Metastatic Melanoma.Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021 Jul 1;11(Suppl 1):e2021164S. doi: 10.5826/dpc.11S1a164S. eCollection 2021 Jul. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021. PMID: 34447613 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The efficacy and safety of combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (nivolumab plus ipilimumab): a systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Surg Oncol. 2020 Jul 3;18(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s12957-020-01933-5. World J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32620130 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Q-TWiST Analysis to Assess Benefit-Risk of Pembrolizumab in Patients with PD-L1-Positive Advanced or Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Jan;37(1):105-116. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0752-0. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019. PMID: 30515719 Free PMC article.
-
A Q-TWiST Analysis Comparing Nivolumab and Therapy of Investigator's Choice in Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Platinum-Refractory Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Aug;37(8):1041-1047. doi: 10.1007/s40273-019-00798-1. Pharmacoeconomics. 2019. PMID: 30972702 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment-Free Survival: A Novel Outcome Measure of the Effects of Immune Checkpoint Inhibition-A Pooled Analysis of Patients With Advanced Melanoma.J Clin Oncol. 2019 Dec 10;37(35):3350-3358. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.00345. Epub 2019 Sep 9. J Clin Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31498030 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
